Difference between a normal wave function and a standing-wave function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of wave functions as either standing or moving waves, specifically the expression y(x,t) = A cos(kx - ωt). It highlights that a traveling wave can be represented as a sum of two standing waves, and conversely, a standing wave can be decomposed into two traveling waves. The conversation also touches on the phenomenon of standing sound waves in open-ended pipes, questioning how they can persist without dissipating. Participants clarify that the original statement about a single standing wave differs from the concept of a sum of two standing waves. The thread concludes with a suggestion to consider the effects of rotation on wave patterns, drawing parallels to the Doppler effect.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Hello! So as you all know the wave-function can be expressed as:

y(x,t) = A\cos(kx-\omega t)

However, this can be interpreted as both a standing and moving wave. So when do you interpret it as either of those? Are there any special conditions that should be written along with the wave function?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can this be interpreted as a standing wave?
 
For the difference between traveling waves and standing waves, see e.g. here:

http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/claw/Page15/ProjectCLAW-P15.html

This page uses sines instead of cosines, but the idea is the same in either case.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vanadium 50 said:
How can this be interpreted as a standing wave?

You could just use a identity to transform it into

A\cos(kx)\cos(\omega t)- A\sin(kx)\sin(\omega t)

Which is a sum of two clearly standing waves.

Am I wrong in saying that sum is a standing wave too? I have difficulties in graphing trig expressions in my mind.

jtbell: ahh, thanks I'll check it out now
 
OK after checking out jtbell's excellent website I see that I am an idiot for thinking that the wave function can be used to model a standing wave.

But still, what's up with a moving wave being the sum of two standing waves? Is this a random math-quirk or is there some physics behind this?

EDIT: Also, isn't it a bit weird that a standing-sound wave in a pipe open-ended on both sides is able to survive and stay standing for a long time? You'd think the two waves making up the standing wave would just dissipate out the ends the moment they reach them, but for some reason the waves get reflected back?
 
Last edited:
Nikitin said:
You could just use a identity to transform it into

A\cos(kx)\cos(\omega t)- A\sin(kx)\sin(\omega t)

Which is a sum of two clearly standing waves.

Yes, you can decompose a traveling wave into a sum of two standing waves. You can also decompose a standing wave into a sum of two traveling waves, which has a natural physical interpretation in terms of a single wave "bouncing back and forth" between the fixed ends of the string (or whatever the medium is).
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
At risk of stating the obvious, your OP said "a (one) standing wave" which is not quite the same as "the sum of TWO standing waves".

If you want to make this more fun, think about a vibration pattern in a rotating disk, when the pattern and the disk are rotating at a different angular velocities: (1) in a coordinate system fixed to the earth, (2) in a system fixed to the disk.

(Hint: the frequency you "see" looking from the Earth is not the same as the frequency you see (or feel?) if you are sitting on the disk. This is similar to the Doppler effect.)
 
Back
Top