Difference between chemical potential, ionization energy, band gap energy, and Fermi level?

  • Thread starter Thread starter new_986
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigen values
new_986
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Kohn-Sham Eigen values?

Hi everybody...
I have read about Density functional theory and Kohn-Sham theorem, I have found in many references that the Kohn-Sham Eigen values have no physically meaning, except the highest Eigen value has been proved by the Sham and Kohn as the Chemical potential and by perdew,Parr,Levy and Balduz as the negative of the ionization energy
my question is, what is the different between chemical potential, ionization energy, band gap energy and Fermi level?
I really wanted understand this but I couldn't..
thanks with best regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
new_986 said:
Kohn-Sham Eigen values?

Hi everybody...
I have read about Density functional theory and Kohn-Sham theorem, I have found in many references that the Kohn-Sham Eigen values have no physically meaning, except the highest Eigen value has been proved by the Sham and Kohn as the Chemical potential and by perdew,Parr,Levy and Balduz as the negative of the ionization energy
my question is, what is the different between chemical potential, ionization energy, band gap energy and Fermi level?
I really wanted understand this but I couldn't..
thanks with best regards
It's kind of difficult to understand what all this means. The lowest eigenenergy of the Hamiltonian in DFT corresponds to the ground state energy. The derivative of energy with respect to particle number at constant potential ##V## in DFT corresponds to chemical potential (which corresponds to the Fermi level):
$$\mu=\left(\frac{\partial E}{\partial N}\right)_V$$
The second derivative corresponds to chemical hardness:
$$\eta=\left(\frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial N^2}\right)_V$$
They are related to ionization potential ##I## and electron affinity ##A## via:
$$\mu\approx\frac{1}{2}(-I-A)$$
$$\eta\approx\frac{1}{2}(I-A)$$
So that ##\eta-\mu\approx I##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top