Difference between double and repeated integrals

Click For Summary
Double integrals and repeated integrals refer to the same mathematical concept, where a double integral is an integral over a two-dimensional area, while a repeated integral is a method of evaluating a double integral by integrating one variable at a time. In the example provided, the integral is evaluated first with respect to y and then with respect to x, demonstrating the repeated integration process. The confusion arises from terminology, as both terms can describe the same operation, but "repeated integral" emphasizes the stepwise integration approach. Fubini's Theorem allows for the interchange between double and repeated integrals under certain conditions. Understanding this distinction clarifies the evaluation process and the terminology used in calculus.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm just having some trouble with definitions. I've googled repeated integrals but I haven't yet come across something which has answered my question. Anyway, I'd like to know what the difference is, between double and repeated integrals. For example if I had:

<br /> \int\limits_0^2 {\int\limits_0^x {x^2 y} dydx} <br />

I would evaluate it as follows.

<br /> \int\limits_0^2 {\int\limits_0^x {x^2 y} dydx} <br />

<br /> = \int\limits_0^2 {\left[ {\frac{{x^2 y^2 }}{2}} \right]} _{y = 0}^{y = x} dx<br />

<br /> = \int\limits_0^2 {\left( {\frac{{x^4 }}{2}} \right)} dx<br />

<br /> = \left[ {\frac{{x^5 }}{5}} \right]_0^2 <br />

= 32/5.

Now I assume that I've just evaluated the integral as a "double integral." The question booklet I have lists the question under "repeated integrals." I'm wondering what the difference is and how I can evaluate this integral as a repeated integral. The only thing I can gather about repeated integrals(from the little bits of info I've found on google) is that the integration is done repeatedly wrt one variable but I'm not sure how that works. Can someone please explain to me how to evaluate this integral as a repeated integral? The answer is 16/5.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Benny said:
Hi, I'm just having some trouble with definitions. I've googled repeated integrals but I haven't yet come across something which has answered my question. Anyway, I'd like to know what the difference is, between double and repeated integrals. For example if I had:

<br /> \int\limits_0^2 {\int\limits_0^x {x^2 y} dydx} <br />

I would evaluate it as follows.

<br /> \int\limits_0^2 {\int\limits_0^x {x^2 y} dydx} <br />

<br /> = \int\limits_0^2 {\left[ {\frac{{x^2 y^2 }}{2}} \right]} _{y = 0}^{y = x} dx<br />

<br /> = \int\limits_0^2 {\left( {\frac{{x^4 }}{2}} \right)} dx<br />

<br /> = \color{red} \left ( \frac{1}{2} \right ) \cdot \color{black} \left[ {\frac{{x^5 }}{5}} \right]_0^2 \color{red} \ = \ \frac{16}{5}<br />

= 32/5.

Now I assume that I've just evaluated the integral as a "double integral." The question booklet I have lists the question under "repeated integrals." I'm wondering what the difference is and how I can evaluate this integral as a repeated integral. The only thing I can gather about repeated integrals(from the little bits of info I've found on google) is that the integration is done repeatedly wrt one variable but I'm not sure how that works. Can someone please explain to me how to evaluate this integral as a repeated integral? The answer is 16/5.
the answer to above integral is 16/5.
you forgot the factor of (1/2) shown in RED above.
 
Benny said:
Hi, I'm just having some trouble with definitions. I've googled repeated integrals but I haven't yet come across something which has answered my question. Anyway, I'd like to know what the difference is, between double and repeated integrals. For example if I had:

<br /> \int\limits_0^2 {\int\limits_0^x {x^2 y} dydx} <br />

I would evaluate it as follows.

<br /> \int\limits_0^2 {\int\limits_0^x {x^2 y} dydx} <br />

<br /> = \int\limits_0^2 {\left[ {\frac{{x^2 y^2 }}{2}} \right]} _{y = 0}^{y = x} dx<br />

<br /> = \int\limits_0^2 {\left( {\frac{{x^4 }}{2}} \right)} dx<br />

<br /> = \color{red} \left ( \frac{1}{2} \right ) \cdot \color{black} \left[ {\frac{{x^5 }}{5}} \right]_0^2 \color{red} \ = \ \frac{16}{5}<br />

= 32/5.

Now I assume that I've just evaluated the integral as a "double integral." The question booklet I have lists the question under "repeated integrals." I'm wondering what the difference is and how I can evaluate this integral as a repeated integral. The only thing I can gather about repeated integrals(from the little bits of info I've found on google) is that the integration is done repeatedly wrt one variable but I'm not sure how that works. Can someone please explain to me how to evaluate this integral as a repeated integral? The answer is 16/5.
there's no practical difference between a "double integral" and a "repeated integral". the term "repeated integral" generally refers to the method used to evalute a "double integral":

\mbox{Double Integral = } \int \, \int_{(2D) Region} f(x,y) \, dA \ = \ \int \, \int_{(x,y) Region} f(x,y) \, dx \, dy \ \mbox{ = Repeated Integral}

in your solution above (except for the error shown in RED), you evaluated the "double integral" over a (2D) Region with the method of "repeated integrals" over an (x,y) Region, by first integrating wrt "y" and then integrating wrt "x".
 
Last edited:
What you did is a "repeated" integral because you first found the integral with respect to y and then "repeated" the process- found the derivative of the result with respect to x. A "double" integral is, as geosonel said, an integral over a two dimensional area, not necessarily saying anything about the coordinate system.
It is a basic theorem that, given a specific coordinate system, we can change a double integral into a repeated integral ("Fubini's Theorem"). Typically, we set up a problem in terms of a double integral and then change to a repeated integral to evaluate the integral.
 
I just rechecked my working and after attempting some of the questions I did last night, again, I've founded that my initial attempts had many arithmetic errors which lead to deviations from the correct answer. Thanks for the help guys.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
830
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
782
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
1K