Difference Between \partial x and d x in Derivatives?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that there is a significant difference between using \partial x and d x in the context of derivatives. The notation \partial is specifically used for partial derivatives, while d is reserved for total derivatives, and mixing them can lead to confusion. In mathematical expressions, the correct notation must be used, especially in formal contexts like exams. For instance, the partial derivative of a function with respect to one variable should be denoted as \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}, not \frac{\partial f}{dx}. Using the appropriate notation is crucial for clear communication in mathematics.
KStolen
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi, this may seem like a silly question but here goes :
Is there any difference between writing \partial x and d x when referring to partial derivatives? I've always used the simple d x for both because I don't like drawing the curvy d. To me, \partial N / d x and d N / d x are the same really.

However, if in an exam I was asked to state a theorem (say Green's theorem), should I use the partial derivative symbol when writing the equation?
How about when I actually use the theorem?]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
KStolen said:
Hi, this may seem like a silly question but here goes :
Is there any difference between writing \partial x and d x when referring to partial derivatives? I've always used the simple d x for both because I don't like drawing the curvy d. To me, \partial N / d x and d N / d x are the same really.
They aren't the same, so you shouldn't use the straight derivative when a partial derivative is called for. Also, don't mix the notation. The partial of f with respect to x is written as
\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}
not as
\frac{\partial f}{dx}

Here f would be a function of two or more variables, such as f(x, y) = 2x + 3y2. Assuming that x and y are independent, it wouldn't make any sense to talk about df/dx.

For this simple example,
\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = 2
and
\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = 6y

If you don't like this style of notation, there's another that is used, with subscripts. fx represents the partial of f with respect to x. In the example I gave, fx = 2 and fy = 6y.

KStolen said:
However, if in an exam I was asked to state a theorem (say Green's theorem), should I use the partial derivative symbol when writing the equation?
How about when I actually use the theorem?]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top