Difference between these 4-vector derivatives?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the equivalence of two Lagrangian densities in the context of field theory, specifically addressing the mathematical relationship between the first derivatives and second derivatives of fields. Participants explore the implications of integration by parts and the conditions under which the action integrals derived from these Lagrangians are equal.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the first Lagrangian density involves the square of the first derivative of the field, while the second involves the second derivative multiplied by another field variable, suggesting integration by parts is involved.
  • Another participant explains the process of deriving the action integral from the Lagrangian and how integrating by parts leads to the equivalence of the two Lagrangian densities, provided the fields vanish at infinity.
  • A later reply questions the limits of the action integral and the assumption that fields vanish at those limits, indicating a need for clarification on these points.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the definition of the Lagrangian density and the integration over space to ensure a manifestly relativistic formulation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical process leading to the equivalence of the two Lagrangian densities, but there are questions regarding the assumptions about the limits of integration and the behavior of fields at infinity, indicating some unresolved aspects of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the fields vanishing at infinity and the specific limits of integration in the action integral, which remain unresolved.

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Hey everyone,

So I've come across something in my notes where it says that these two Lagrangian densities are equal:

\mathcal{L}_{1}=(\partial_{mu}\phi)^{\dagger}(\partial^{\mu}\phi)-m^{2}\phi^{\dagger}\phi

\mathcal{L}_{2}=-\phi^{\dagger}\Box\phi - m^{2}\phi^{\dagger}\phi

where \Box = \partial^{\mu} \partial_{\mu}=\frac{1}{c^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial t^{2}}-\nabla^{2}

How does this come about? I know that the second term in each density is equal of course, but the first term in each...how are they equal? can someone explain please?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first one has the square of the first derivative of the field where the second one has has the second derivative with power one multiplied by another field variable. This suggests there have been an integration by parts and so by equal, the note means the action integrals for this two Lagrangian densities are equal. Of course provided that the fields vanish at infinity.
 
Hey, erm I'm sorry I don't really understand lol...:S
 
For getting the equation of motion from the Lagrangian, at first the action integral should be written.
<br /> S=\int \mathcal L \ d^4 x<br />
Now for your case, we have:
<br /> S=\int \partial_\mu \phi^\dagger \partial^\mu \phi \ d^4 x - \int m^2 \phi^\dagger \phi \ d^4 x<br />
Integrating the first integral by parts, gives:
<br /> S=\phi^\dagger \partial^\mu \phi |_{(0,-\vec{\infty})}^{(\infty,\vec{\infty})}-\int \phi^\dagger \partial_\mu \partial^\mu \phi -\int m^2 \phi^\dagger \phi \ d^4 x<br />
But the first term is zero, so we get your second Lagrangian density.

The actions coming from the two Lagrangians are equal and so give the same equations of motion. Your Lagrangian densities are equal in this sense!
 
Omg thank you so much that's so simple! The only thing is, how do we know that the action integral is from -infty to +infty? and the fields are defined to vanish in these limits right?
 
The action integral is S=\int_{t_1}^{t_2}L dt(The time limits in the integral of my previous post was wrong). Varying this w.r.t. whatever dynamical variables, gives us the equations governing the evolution of those variables from t_1 to t_2. But for continuous systems, we define Lagrangian density(\mathcal L) by L=\int \mathcal L d^3 x. To make the procedure manifestly relativistic, people abandon Lagrangian and work with Lagrangian density. Anyway, just like when you want to find total energy from energy density, you should integrate over all of space. The space integrations in the action integral and its limits come from here.
 
Wow man, thanks sooo much honestly you're the boss :D !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K