Differences between X-rays and Gamma rays

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Rev. Cheeseman
Messages
360
Reaction score
21
Some people said if it is originated from electrons then it is X-ray but if it is originated from the nucleus it is Gamma ray. But people can produced X-rays and Gamma rays by Bremsstrahlung process and in Bremsstrahlung process it is resulted from decelerating or braking electrons. So, Gamma rays produced via Bremsstrahlung are more similar to X-rays as it is produced by electrons. Why people still calling them Gamma rays although it is not generated from the nucleus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The last time this got asked I discovered that some sources regard gamma rays as "anything produced from the nucleus" and x rays as "anything produced from the electrons beyond UV", while some sources do as @vanhees71 says and label anything above a certain frequency as gamma rays. I think the latter is more common, especially as we now understand clearly that it's all just EM and the source doesn't really make a difference. I'd presume whatever source you are reading about Bremsstrahlung is using that definition too.

Either way, it's just a label. It's all photons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rev. Cheeseman, sophiecentaur and vanhees71
Indeed, em. decays of nuclei are usually in the ##\gamma##-ray range. That's actually, where the name comes from, because it was one of the three known kinds of nuclear decay, dubbed ##\alpha##-, ##\beta##-, and ##\gamma##-radiation.

An important exception is Thorium-229:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_clock#The_history_of_the_nuclear_clock

See particularly Reference 6+7 therein.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Rev. Cheeseman, hutchphd and Ibix