Different Slices of Now Observable from Earth?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vanadium90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Observable
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of different "slices of now" as presented in Brian Greene's PBS series, particularly how an observer's motion affects their perception of time. An example is given of an alien 10 billion light years away, illustrating that its "now" varies based on its movement relative to Earth. The question arises about why similar effects are not observed on Earth when viewing distant galaxies, despite different velocities of telescopes. Calculations suggest that telescopes at different latitudes should perceive events at different times, yet this discrepancy does not seem to manifest in practice. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of time perception and simultaneity in the context of relativity.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


Q-reeus said:
OK have no objection on that.

Covered by previous comment - Shapiro type time delay does not imply frequency change.

Yes, of course, but it can cause an apparent velocity differential under the right conditions which gives a Doppler shift.
I could propose a thought experiment to show that, but it's getting a little too much off topic, probably.
It is under conditions where the source and the observer are at exactly the same gravity potential.
I think I was wrong about gravitational lensing possibly causing a Doppler shift, I'm still thinking that one out.
 
Last edited:
  • #33


Zentrails said:
Yes, of course, but it can cause an apparent velocity differential under the right conditions which gives a Doppler shift.
I could propose a thought experiment to show that, but it's getting a little too much off topic, probably.
It is under conditions where the source and the observer are at exactly the same gravity potential.

Ah - you may be right about a 'blip' type Doppler shift if this is referring to a dynamical aspect, where one is bouncing radar off say an orbiting planet as it passes behind the sun, or where a massive object passes across the line of sight between 'fixed' source and receiver. That should give a very small and brief kind of 'FM modulation' that symmetrically cancels as per a full sinusoidal cycle (modulation cycle that is - not one cycle of emitted radiation!). It would not exist though if source, receiver, and gravitating mass are in a fixed relation. So was that your idea?
 
Last edited:
  • #34


Q-reeus said:
Ah - you may be right about a 'blip' type Doppler shift if this is referring to a dynamical aspect, where one is bouncing radar off say an orbiting planet as it passes behind the sun, or where a massive object passes across the line of sight between 'fixed' source and receiver. That should give a very small and brief kind of 'FM modulation' that symmetrically cancels as per a full sinusoidal cycle (modulation cycle that is - not one cycle of emitted radiation!). It would not exist though if source, receiver, and gravitating mass are in a fixed relation. So was that your idea?

OK, no one is yelling at me for being off topic so here goes:
Tell me if you can spot any logical errors in my thought experiment.

You have two spaceships traveling far apart form each other, but at the same velocity/direction.

They each use sophisticated celestial navigation to remain exactly the same distance from each other at all times (pretending they are in "flat" space at all times during the experiment).

Ship One continuously (no pulses) broadcasts an ordinary, spherically radiating microwave signal set at an extremely precise fixed frequency as monochromatic as possible.

Ship Two (the observer) receives the signal and measures the frequency with extreme precision.

They both pass by the sun perfectly tangentially, with the sun in between, so eventually the signal is blocked.

As the ships approach the sun, the apparent distance between the ships should increase at a rate which is mostly (but not a simple calculation as it is in "flat" space) proportional to the tangential velocity of the two ships with respect to the sun because the signal now has to pass through a region of space where the signal follows geodesic lines.

The two ships have to be far enough apart at all times from the sun to be in "flat" space and at exactly the same respective gravitation potential, to eliminate any "ordinary" gravitational red-shift.

If that rate of change of apparent distance is reasonably constant, there should be a Doppler shift in the received signal which remains about the same until the sun blocks the signal.

As they regain the signal after passing the sun, the Doppler shift should still be there exactly the same as before they passed the sun.

Once the two ships get far enough away for the sun to be in "flat" space again, the Doppler shift disappears.

The key is that the ships HAVE to use celestial navigation at all times to remain the exact same distance from each other, ignoring GR space-time distortion that the radar signal passes through.

If the apparent distance change includes an apparent acceleration, then the Doppler shift should also change as the ships approach and depart the area near the sun.

The experiment then can be repeated, with Ship Two now merely reflecting the signal back to Ship One. Now, Ship One is both the source and observer. The observed Doppler shift should be exactly twice as large, no matter if there is just an apparent constant velocity OR acceleration.

Of course, the Doppler shift will be tiny, probably unmeasurable even by the finest interferometer techniques available presently. I'm also assuming that any possible gravitational lensing will be far lower in intensity than the apparent Doppler effect and that the observer ship can completely eliminate the effect of any microwave signals coming from the Sun during the experiment. That could be the fly in the ointment.

As far as relating this experiment to the thread topic, I think it is safe to assume that both ships would experience the "same now" as an abstract construct, while their instruments are simultaneously telling them otherwise.

ha, ha, get it? simultaneously telling them they are not in the "same now." LOL
 
  • #35


Zentrails said:
They both pass by the sun perfectly tangentially, with the sun in between, so eventually the signal is blocked.
This is equivalent to my second guess. If the radar beam is very narrow it will be blocked, otherwise diffraction ensures some 'gets by'.
If that rate of change of apparent distance is reasonably constant, there should be a Doppler shift in the received signal which remains about the same until the sun blocks the signal.
To the extent rate of change is constant, yes. But I would expect a rather peaky affair.
As they regain the signal after passing the sun, the Doppler shift should still be there exactly the same as before they passed the sun.
Not quite - sign of Doppler shift will reverse owing to reversed sense of rate of change of time delay. That's what was meant by 'full sinusoidal modulation cycle' - cancels overall. You will have to do your own searching on this, but in general it should be covered in theory of electro-optic phase modulation - in particular the transient modulation of the refractive index of an optical fiber element passing monochromatic light. Fascinating to consider the fine details. but yes, this is getting off topic.
 
  • #36


Q-reeus said:
This is equivalent to my second guess. If the radar beam is very narrow it will be blocked, otherwise diffraction ensures some 'gets by'.

To the extent rate of change is constant, yes. But I would expect a rather peaky affair.

Not quite - sign of Doppler shift will reverse owing to reversed sense of rate of change of time delay.

Yep, you're right. I was proposing a spherical wave propagating from the source like a radio station with only one antenna, not a beam, but sure a little bit would get by due to diffraction.

As the ships come out from behind the sun the apparent distance will appear to be decreasing with time, giving a blue shift, I missed that somehow. So, you CAN get a blue shift from gravitational bending, I was wrong about that. It would certainly be a very strange set of red, then blue shifts like you said.

It is fascinating and far from my expertise, which is polymer physics. Especially some of the newer results coming out using materials with negative RI's, which I don't understand at all.

I sent the thought experiment to my physics major college sophomore daughter. It will be interesting if she spots my error. If she does she'll be happy, she loves catching my mistakes!

Now, back to NOW! LOL
 
  • #37


Zentrails said:
I sent the thought experiment to my physics major college sophomore daughter. It will be interesting if she spots my error. If she does she'll be happy, she loves catching my mistakes!
And maybe she's a good catch!:!)
Now, back to NOW! LOL
Right on - there's no time like the present! :smile:
 
  • #38


Q-reeus said:
And maybe she's a good catch!:!)

Right on - there's no time like the present! :smile:

Her boyfriend thinks so, and he's Russian from a rich family, so that's OK with me,
especially since they are both straight A physics majors this semester. <shameless bragging/>

And there is no better present than time!
I hope I get lots for Xmas. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
7K
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K