Different understanding of the universe if .

  • Thread starter Thread starter Low-Q
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores how human size could alter our understanding of the universe and the smallest particles. It posits scenarios where humans are either the size of a pinhead or the size of Earth, questioning how this would affect our perception and comprehension of cosmic and quantum phenomena. The precision of our instruments would vary significantly based on size, leading to different interpretations of universal truths. The conversation highlights the limitations of human experience in grasping complex scientific concepts due to our evolutionary context. Overall, it serves as a thought experiment on the implications of size on knowledge and perception.
Low-Q
Gold Member
Messages
283
Reaction score
9
I have thought about something for a while now, and wondered if we would have a different understanding of the universe, and the smallest known particle, if we humans were smaller or larger.
What if we humans was at the size of a pinhead (And maintained the same brain capacity as normal sized humans). How would we understand the universe, and how would we understand the smallest particles?
What if humans was at the size of the Earth (And maintained the same brain capacity as a normal sized human). What would our understanding of the universe, and the smallest particles be?

The precicion of our instruments would differ a lot I assume. Taking that into account, we would probably have two very different "trouth" about the universe and its origin.

This thread is meant as a think tank, or similar. Just for curiosity.
If it doesn't fit into this section of the forum, or doesn't fit into the forum at all, please let me know.

Vidar
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's a bit like asking "if unicorns existed, would we want to pet them?"

Certainly the size/speed of human experience is a factor in our "common sense / intuition / etc" and makes it hard to grasp some of the principles of cosmology and Quantum Mechanics because they are so utterly outside our range of experience and thus are things the knowledge of which has had zero survival value as humans evolved and I believe that's your point.
 
Hey the question about petting unicorns could turn out to be important if you meet one : )
That aside I suspect that there is a fairly narrow range of size that is compatible with something like human experience, and it can be interesting as a thought experiment to ponder "what would a sentient creature experience if it were the size of a bacterium - or of a solar system ? " though we quicly run into impossibilities - e.g. nothing the size of an atom could have the required complexity, etc - but the nature of such impossibilities is interesting too...

</Random pseudo-philosophical musings>
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top