Different understanding of the universe if .

  • Thread starter Thread starter Low-Q
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the implications of human size on our understanding of the universe and fundamental particles. Participants speculate on scenarios where humans are the size of a pinhead or the size of Earth, maintaining the same cognitive abilities. The conversation highlights how our instruments' precision would vary significantly with size, leading to potentially divergent truths about the universe and its origins. The thread serves as a thought experiment, inviting curiosity about the relationship between size, perception, and knowledge in cosmology and quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic cosmology concepts
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of human cognitive capabilities
  • Awareness of measurement precision in scientific instruments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of scale on perception in physics
  • Explore thought experiments in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between size and complexity in biological organisms
  • Study the implications of measurement precision in scientific discoveries
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, philosophers, and anyone interested in the intersection of human perception, size, and the understanding of the universe.

Low-Q
Gold Member
Messages
283
Reaction score
9
I have thought about something for a while now, and wondered if we would have a different understanding of the universe, and the smallest known particle, if we humans were smaller or larger.
What if we humans was at the size of a pinhead (And maintained the same brain capacity as normal sized humans). How would we understand the universe, and how would we understand the smallest particles?
What if humans was at the size of the Earth (And maintained the same brain capacity as a normal sized human). What would our understanding of the universe, and the smallest particles be?

The precicion of our instruments would differ a lot I assume. Taking that into account, we would probably have two very different "trouth" about the universe and its origin.

This thread is meant as a think tank, or similar. Just for curiosity.
If it doesn't fit into this section of the forum, or doesn't fit into the forum at all, please let me know.

Vidar
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's a bit like asking "if unicorns existed, would we want to pet them?"

Certainly the size/speed of human experience is a factor in our "common sense / intuition / etc" and makes it hard to grasp some of the principles of cosmology and Quantum Mechanics because they are so utterly outside our range of experience and thus are things the knowledge of which has had zero survival value as humans evolved and I believe that's your point.
 
Hey the question about petting unicorns could turn out to be important if you meet one : )
That aside I suspect that there is a fairly narrow range of size that is compatible with something like human experience, and it can be interesting as a thought experiment to ponder "what would a sentient creature experience if it were the size of a bacterium - or of a solar system ? " though we quicly run into impossibilities - e.g. nothing the size of an atom could have the required complexity, etc - but the nature of such impossibilities is interesting too...

</Random pseudo-philosophical musings>
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K