Differential drag on a cup anemometer

  • Thread starter Thread starter cocoon95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differential Drag
AI Thread Summary
Differential drag on a four-cup anemometer is influenced by the shape and drag coefficients of the cups. The drag coefficient for an open cup is approximately 1.42, while a closed cup has a coefficient of about 0.38. When altering the cup's shape, such as slicing it in half, the differential drag may change, but the extent of this change depends on the new shape's surface area and orientation relative to the wind. The discussion highlights the importance of calculating the drag force using the area and the difference in drag coefficients. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately determining the performance of the anemometer.
cocoon95
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If differential drag on a four cup anemometer causes its rotation, how does one calculate the differential drag on a specific size cup and with a specific wind velocity assuming the wind is constant and in the same horizontal plane as the four cups.?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks for the link. It got me started in the right direction.
 
okay, The drag coefficeint is clear. If however I slice half of the cup off with a vertical cut and blank the end, so I really have a 1/4 sphere with a flat plate at the end of the cup, does the differential Cd remain the same for a relative wind perpendicular to the 1/4 cup vs the 1/4 sphere. Or does if change and only depend on the surface area of the 1/4 cup and 1/4 sphere?
Remember that shape matters!
 
An open cup is around CD of 1.42, closed side is only 0.38.
http://www.windpower.org/en/tour/wtrb/drag.htm , the area is the same - so the force is just the area * the difference in Cd
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Knowing that the CD for an open cup is 1.42 and the closed side 0.38, is the CD for a 1/2 cup the same as a whole cup or does the CD change due to the different shape. If it changes would it be expected to change by a very small amount say < 0.05 or something larger like 0.10.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top