Differential equation of gradually varied flow

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of the formula for gradually varied flow in open channel hydraulics, specifically the relationship between K and y. The key equation presented is Q = (1/n)(A)(R^2/3) [(s)(^0.5)], leading to K = (1/n)(b)(y^5/3). The participants clarify that K_0 corresponds to y_0, and the ratio of K to K_0 is expressed as (K_0/K)^2 = (y_0/y)^{10/3}. The confusion regarding the cancellation of variables n and b is addressed, confirming that they do not cancel out in the context of the equations discussed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of open channel flow principles
  • Familiarity with hydraulic equations, specifically Q = (1/n)(A)(R^2/3)
  • Knowledge of the concept of hydraulic radius (R)
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills for handling equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Manning's equation in detail
  • Learn about the implications of gradually varied flow in hydraulic engineering
  • Explore the concept of hydraulic radius and its significance in flow calculations
  • Investigate the relationship between flow rate (Q) and channel geometry
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in civil engineering, particularly those specializing in hydraulic engineering and open channel flow analysis.

fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I have no idea how the third formula of dy/dx is derived ...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the Q = (1/n)(A)(R^2/3) [(s)(^0.5)] ,
Q = K [(s)(^0.5)]
, so , K= (1/n)(A)(R^2/3)

i know that for very wide channel , y = R
A = by
K= (1/n)(A)(R^2/3)
= (1/n)(by)(y^2/3)
= (1/n)(b)(y^5/3)
Thus , (K^2) = [[ (1/n)(b)]^2 ](y^10/3)
but , it seems that the author just got (y^10/3) ,

So , is the author wrong ?
 

Attachments

  • 572.PNG
    572.PNG
    31 KB · Views: 888
Physics news on Phys.org
On first sight: no. Consider ##{K_0\over K}## instead of just ##K##.
There is no second sight because your use of the template is utterly unenlightening...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
BvU said:
On first sight: no. Consider ##{K_0\over K}## instead of just ##K##.
There is no second sight because your use of the template is utterly unenlightening...
sorry , i mean $$K_0$$ corresponds to $$y_0$$
and $$K$$ corresponds to $$y$$
 
Yes, I understand. Don't the n's and the b's cancel ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
BvU said:
Yes, I understand. Don't the n's and the b's cancel ?
in my working , i can't cancel the n and b ... Is there anything wrong with my working ?
 
Not from what I can see :smile: because what I can see is nothing ...(refer to post #2). I have no idea what this is about.

I see you write ##K^2 = (b/n)^2\; y^{10/3}## and I add ##K_0^2 = (b/n) ^2\; y_0^{10/3}## leading to ##\left ( {K_0\over K}\right ) ^2 = \left ({y_0\over y}\right )^{10/3}##. That simple.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
915
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K