Solution to Initial Value Problem: dy/dx = y-3, y(0)=4

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the initial value problem defined by the differential equation dy/dx = y - 3 with the initial condition y(0) = 4. Participants clarify the separation of variables method, leading to the integral ln(y - 3) = x + C. The solution is derived as y = Ce^x + 3, where C is a constant determined by applying the initial condition. By substituting y(0) = 4, the value of C can be calculated. The thread emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between logarithmic and exponential functions in isolating y.
Mitchtwitchita
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
The solution of the initial value problem, dy/dx = y-3. y(0) = 4, what does y=?

dy/y-3 = dx
1/y-3 dy = dx
ln(y-3) = ? + C

I have no idea how to do this one, can anybody please help me out? I'm having a hard time seeing how to separate the y and the -3 or if they are separable at all.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mitchtwitchita said:
The solution of the initial value problem, dy/dx = y-3. y(0) = 4, what does y=?

dy/y-3 = dx
1/y-3 dy = dx
ln(y-3) = ? + C

I have no idea how to do this one, can anybody please help me out? I'm having a hard time seeing how to separate the y and the -3 or if they are separable at all.

well you started it right:

\frac{dy}{dx}=y-3=>\frac{dy}{y-3}=dx

Now to get our answer we integrate both parts

\int\frac{dy}{y-3}=\int dx=>ln(y-3)=x+C

Now do you know how to isolate y by itself. Hint: remember that ln and the exponential function with base "e" are inverses. So, exponentiate both sides, and try to go as further as you can. If you're still stuck, ask again.
 
I do. thanks stupidmath. I guess it was the "invisible" x that got me.

y-3 = Ce^x
y = Ce^x + 3
 
Mitchtwitchita said:
I do. thanks stupidmath. I guess it was the "invisible" x that got me.

y-3 = Ce^x
y = Ce^x + 3

Now apply your initial conditons to find C.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top