Solve 1st Order ODE from Transcendental Equation

gonadas91
Messages
75
Reaction score
5
It is a general doubt about the following equation: Imagine I want to calculate an unknown function y(x), and my starting equation is of the type

y(x)^{2}=\frac{1}{x^{2}Log^{2}(A(x)y(x)^{2})}

, then, am I allowed to start with the equation

y(x)=\frac{1}{xLog(A(x)y(x)^{2})}

and differenciate in both sides of the equation, to obtain a first order diferential equation to get y(x)?

(Note that the beginning equation is a trascendental equation, but why not trying to solve the first order ODE?)Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see why this wouldn't be allowed but I'd assume setting ##f(x)=y(x)^2## and solving for ##f(x)## would be simpler. You can ofc use ##log(a)^2=log(a)*log(a)=log(2a)## to remove the square on the logarithmic function.
 
Mmm the last property of the logs is not valid. My question actually has to be with the modifications that are allowed on a differential equation. Also, the resulting differential equation using that is not depending on A(g) which annoys me somehow...
 
oh yeah ofc it isn't haha, too late for this here
 
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Back
Top