Differentiate inverse (e^x + ln x )

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the derivative of the inverse function of f(x) = e^x + ln(x) at the point e. Participants clarify that the inverse function f-1(x) cannot be solved algebraically and suggest using numerical methods for general cases. However, they confirm that f-1(e) has a straightforward solution. The chain rule is emphasized for differentiating the inverse function, leading to the conclusion that the derivative can be computed using the formula (f-1)'(b) = 1/f'(a), where b = f(a).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inverse functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of exponential and logarithmic functions
  • Basic skills in numerical methods for function approximation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inverse functions in detail
  • Learn how to apply the chain rule for differentiating inverse functions
  • Explore numerical methods for finding roots of equations
  • Investigate the behavior of exponential and logarithmic functions in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in inverse functions, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of differentiation techniques involving exponential and logarithmic functions.

Ambidext
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f(x) = ex + ln x

Find (f-1) ' (e)

Homework Equations



let y = f-1 x

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried finding the inverse of f(x) but got stuck. I arrived at:

x = ey + ln y

How do I make y the subject of formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will not be able to algebraically find f-1(x) using normal means. You may need to use a special function to help you.
 
use this rule: (f-1)’(b) = 1/f’(a) where b=f(a).

To get a solve: e = ea + ln(a)
 
Ambidext said:
I tried finding the inverse of f(x) but got stuck. I arrived at:

x = ey + ln y

How do I make y the subject of formula?
You appear to have a misunderstanding of the concept of an inverse function. The inverse f-1 of some function f(x), if it exists, is the function that solves f-1(f(x))=x. If you denote y=f(x) you can compute df-1(y)/dy by the chain rule.

Try that.

Another aspect of the problem involves finding f-1(e). In general you will need to use numerical methods to find f-1(y). You do not need to resort to numerical methods to find f-1(e). This has an exact and rather simple answer.
 
Thank you all, for the replies.

D H said:
You appear to have a misunderstanding of the concept of an inverse function. The inverse f-1 of some function f(x), if it exists, is the function that solves f-1(f(x))=x. If you denote y=f(x) you can compute df-1(y)/dy by the chain rule.

Try that.

Another aspect of the problem involves finding f-1(e). In general you will need to use numerical methods to find f-1(y). You do not need to resort to numerical methods to find f-1(e). This has an exact and rather simple answer.

The question already gave y = f(x). Was simply lazy to use another letter for f-1(x) :rolleyes: But yeah, I do know that f-1(f(x)) = x. But your method to get df-1(x) / dx looks pretty good. Thanks!
 
By the way, I just realized my question was misleading the way I typed. I meant to differentiate f-1(e), where f(x) = ex + ln x, and not differentiate 1/f(e).
 
There is admittedly a bit of ambiguity in whether f-1 means the inverse function or the multiplicative inverse of the function. Nonetheless, we did figure out what you meant.

You still do want to differentiate f(x), by the way.
 
Well, I got:

f(e) = ee + ln e

let z = f-1(e)

e = ez + ln z
ln e = z + ln (ln z)

z = ln e - ln y

dz/de = 1/e - 1/y (dz/de)
dz/de(1 - 1/y) = 1/e
dz/de = 1 / e(1 - 1/y)


ARGHHH AND I GOT STUCK!
 
Ambidext said:
Well, I got:

f(e) = ee + ln e
You should not be looking for f(e). You want some value x such that f(x)=e. In short, you want f-1(e).

[QUOE]let z = f-1(e)[/QUOTE]
You don't want to do this, either. This is defining z to be the specific number f-1(e).

dz/de
This makes zero sense. z is a specific number here, not a variable, so the derivative with respect to some variable is zero. However, e is not a variable. It too is a specific number. Calculating dz/de makes as much sense as does d2/d3 (which is as meaningless as it looks).
 
  • #10
D H said:
You should not be looking for f(e). You want some value x such that f(x)=e. In short, you want f-1(e).

So which means I should equate ln x + ex = e, and find for x?
 
  • #11
Exactly.
 
  • #12
But that'll give me

e = ln x + ex
1 = x + ln (ln x)
x =1 - ln (ln x) ?

Sorry my maths is just hopeless.
 
  • #13
Ambidext said:
But that'll give me

e = ln x + ex

Hint: ln(1) = 0, look at what 'x' was replaced with.
 
  • #14
Okay, so

e = ex + ln x
x = 1,

then how do I find (f-1)'(e)?
 
  • #15
use the formula in post #3
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K