Difficult Elastic Collision problem between two springs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a difficult elastic collision problem involving two springs and point masses. Participants emphasize the need to apply Newton's third law to derive the relationship between the compressions of the two springs. The conversation highlights the complexities introduced by the springs' masses and non-uniformity, suggesting that modeling the system as two point masses with springs attached simplifies the analysis. The effective spring constant for springs in series is also mentioned as a useful approach for tackling the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's third law of motion
  • Familiarity with potential and kinetic energy concepts
  • Knowledge of spring constants and their relationships
  • Basic principles of elastic collisions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effective spring constant for springs in series
  • Learn about modeling collisions with point masses
  • Explore the dynamics of massive springs and their effects on motion
  • Investigate internal oscillations in elastic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and elastic collisions, as well as engineers working with spring systems and dynamic modeling.

physicsguy1011
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
HI, I’m trying to get better at physics problems while I’m out of school. I’ve been trying these problems over and over and cant seem to get them. I dont have a teacher to help me so I’m wondering if any of you could help. I was hoping I could see how you solve the problem, and what answers you get. Thanks for the help in advance!!!
Relevant Equations
Elastic potential energy
Linear momentum
Impulse
Conservation of momentum
Elastic collision
203C3019-8B65-4110-87AF-A31336E4555A.jpeg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is not how the homework forum operates around here. You have to make your attempt first. Then we can offer assistance.
 
jbriggs444 said:
That is not how the homework forum operates around here. You have to make your attempt first. Then we can offer assistance.

This is where I am so far. I know that the potential energy of a spring is equal to the change in kinetic energy of an object that hits the spring, but that's for a non elastic object that comes into contact with the spring. I am lost when it comes to the fact that there are two elastic objects coming into contact with each-other. So my solution is not that in depth yet.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 499
Can you write down an equation that relates the compression of object 1 to the compression of object 2? Say, for instance the compression at a time when the force between the two objects is equal to F (any F will do).

Behind the scenes, I have realized that there are too many variables here and not enough equations. We know how much kinetic energy has to be absorbed, but we have two places it can be stored. We need to be able to write down another equation so we can figure out how it will end up being divided.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physicsguy1011 and etotheipi
jbriggs444 said:
Behind the scenes, I have realized that there are too many variables here and not enough equations. We know how much kinetic energy has to be absorbed, but we have two places it can be stored. We need to be able to write down another equation so we can figure out how it will end up being divided.
Doesn't Newton's 3rd law provide that equation? Note that ##V_{cm}=0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physicsguy1011 and jbriggs444
kuruman said:
Doesn't Newton's 3rd law provide that equation? Note that ##V_{cm}=0##.
Right. I was skipping past the invocation of Newton's third on the [perhaps mistaken] idea that it was too obvious to mention.
 
The question is well-crafted in that some of the given information may be redundant, but it is internally consistent. One can get the relation between ##x_1## and ##x_2## either by using Newton's 3rd using the spring constants or by considering that the ratio of distances to the center of mass is and remains constant. Once the velocities are chosen, the spring constant ratio is fixed.

Now that I think about it, the two springs can be replaced with an equivalent spring in which case one does not need to worry about a second equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: physicsguy1011
I’m not sure I understand this
 
physicsguy1011 said:
This is where I am so far. I know that the potential energy of a spring is equal to the change in kinetic energy of an object that hits the spring, but that's for a non elastic object that comes into contact with the spring. I am lost when it comes to the fact that there are two elastic objects coming into contact with each-other. So my solution is not that in depth yet.
They expect to to model this as two point masses with springs attached at their leading ends, with the unextended lengths of the springs equal to the radius of each ball.
 
  • #10
physicsguy1011 said:
I am lost when it comes to the fact that there are two elastic objects coming into contact with each-other.
Your doubts are well founded. In reality, this is a problem in "massive springs", i.e. springs whose masses cannot be neglected. Worse, they are non-uniform.
This leads to all sorts of complexities, such as internal oscillations, varying area of contact and non-uniform compression.

To make it tractable, you are expected to model it as two point masses, each with a spring attached. You can do this either by considering the compression of each and the relationship between the two compression forces at any instant, or by using the formula for the effective spring constant for springs in series and treating them as a single spring.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and Chestermiller

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
932
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K