Difficult Skills Easier: Do You Master Trig & Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter starchild75
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Skills that were initially challenging often become second nature as students progress through their courses. Many individuals report that concepts in subjects like trigonometry, calculus, and physics become easier over time, as advanced material builds on foundational knowledge. This progression allows for a deeper understanding of basic principles, which are frequently revisited in more complex contexts. Experiences shared indicate that tackling difficult material initially can lead to mastery, with students noting that they often find themselves able to solve problems intuitively after repeated exposure. Additionally, tutoring others is highlighted as an effective way to reinforce one's understanding of the material, providing unique insights and solidifying knowledge. Overall, the consensus is that continued study and practice lead to significant improvement in previously difficult subjects.
starchild75
Messages
100
Reaction score
1
Do you guys find that skills you may have been weaker in in early classes are more greatly developed in future classes? For example, if you have trouble grasping concepts in trig or calculus, do you master those as you go along in later classes to the point where they become second nature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found that it does happen. I had a hard time solving related rates and things like that, and now it's basically second nature. Same with solving some integrals although lots are still hard, but a lot of the ones in the past can be done in your head sometimes.
 
Yes, that is how I have always learned. For example, takings circuits and having to analyze them without any prior E&M exposure (which was a prerequisite, I took it concurrently) was challenging at first, but then before I knew it I was studying AC power analysis and second order equations were cake even though I had never been formally trained to solve them. Heck, I had a lot of trouble in the beginning just dealing with Kirchoff's rules, but it all became intuitive.

That is usually how I motivate myself to learn, though. I realize how difficult the material is at the time and how little I understand it. Then I realize that in a week or two it won't be so bad and by the end of the quarter I will not have to think twice in order to use the material. I also like to open my textbooks and see how difficult they appear to be in the later chapters, all the while happy that that material will soon be under my control.

-Colin
 
Yes. This constantly happens. In general, whenever one goes further into a subject, and returns to the basics, he/she discovers a better understanding of the basics.
 
The really important stuff keeps popping up over and over again.
 
Yes, I've definitely gotten better at basic physics as I've gotten into more advanced material for my physics major. Maybe that's because advanced physics really just builds on the fundamental principles. It seems to me that all of the physics you'll ever learn, you learn in your first two years. There's really no new physics in advanced classical mechanics or statistical mechanics, just more mathematically advanced techniques. So I guess you're bound to master projectile motion in the process of learning the new stuff.

My experience was quite similar in math. I feel that I have a very in depth understanding of the concepts I learned in the first four semesters of calculus. But strangely enough, this is probably because I didn't take my math major too seriously. To quote my math advisor: "Arun, the reason you're getting good grades in math is because you take weak classes...at this rate you aren't going to get into graduate school." (little did he or I know that I'd end up going to grad school for physics instead of math). While all my peers were taking rigorous analysis and topology, I took advanced calculus, applied linear algebra, and complex analysis. So while all the other math majors were learning about important topics in mathematics, I was basically taking "calculus I for juniors."

Oh, and I also tutored physics and math my last year and a half of college. I'd recommend this to everyone; being forced to explain this stuff to others really gives you a special insight.
 
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...

Similar threads

Back
Top