Diffraction grating for astronomy?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of diffraction gratings for atomic spectra analysis, specifically regarding discrepancies in calculated wavelengths compared to literature values. The participant learned that the grating used may be more suited for astronomical applications, which led to questions about the differences between astronomical and standard gratings. Calibration of the grating is highlighted as a crucial step, with suggestions to use known laser wavelengths for accurate measurements. The conversation also touches on the types of gratings and their manufacturing methods, emphasizing that while all gratings fit the standard equation, proper calibration is essential for accurate results. Overall, the participant seeks guidance on calibrating the grating and understanding its implications for their experiment.
bina0001
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, i am new here, so am not really sure wheather i am asking this qus at the right place. I have a Lab based qus. I just did the atomic spetra analysis using a diffraction grating, analysing hydrogen gas.

But but when i calculate the wavelengths of the lines, its way off from the literature values. I asked my prof, he said somthing about the grating is actually for astronomy, and not really suited for this experiement. I have to find out wats the diffrence.

so what's the diffrence between grating for astronomy and the normal gratings? I tried googling, can't really get any viable results. is there any refeance material I could look at?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Richardson Grating Labs has a nice little book all about gratings, available for free. In it, 'astronomical gratings' are simply very large gratings- there is not inherent unique property about gratings used for that purpose.

Now, there are many types of gratings based on manufacturing method (ruled, holographic, replicated), optical power (planar, concave, grisms, echelles), but none of those obviously accounts for your data. So, my question is:

What have you done to calibrate the grating? Laser lines are ideal, but the sodium line(s) is also a common standard.
 
Actually according to the prof, the grating was mistakenly bought this experiment. I suppose the original plan was to get a grating that would not require calibrating cos the lab manual never said anything about calibrating the grating. But since we end up with this, prof decides to turn this into a mini research project, and we would only need to discuss qualitatively the discrepancy in the values.

So, if gratings requires calibration, u mean to say not all gradings fit the standard equation of dsin\theta=n\lambda? So how do i calibrate it? is it similar to the calibration of a prism? Are there some other forms of grating equations? I am reading through the handbook that u recommended, but it seems like most of the gratings they describe are reflective gratings. However the onces i have read about so far and used in the experiment was something that let light through, then causes interferance on the other side. are the similar conditions?

sorry about the long and wordy reply, i do like to ramble on, and thank for all the help!
 
bina0001 said:
So, if gratings requires calibration, u mean to say not all gradings fit the standard equation of dsin\theta=n\lambda? So how do i calibrate it?
Yes they fit the equation but - how do you measure the angle for each line?
The normal way is to shine light of a few known wavelengths into the system, note the position on the detector and then fit a function to wavelength/position.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top