Diffrence between a transform a map

  • Thread starter Thread starter dionysian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Map Transform
AI Thread Summary
A map and a transform are often used interchangeably in mathematics, typically referring to functions, but definitions can vary by context. Some texts may specify that a map is a continuous function or a homeomorphism, while transforms and operators generally denote linear functions. It's essential to refer to the specific definitions provided in your math book to clarify any distinctions. If no explicit definitions are given, they can generally be assumed to mean the same as a function. Understanding the context and any implicit properties will help clarify their usage.
dionysian
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Is there a diffrence between a map and a transform or are they the same thing? My math book uses the term map but i studyed transforms in lin alg and they seem like the same thing. please help me get this straight in my head.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Depends on the book/subject. function, map, transform and operator are usually synonyms, but some books define one of the latter to be something special, if it's used a lot. E.g. a map may be defined to be a continuous function, or a homeomorphism. Transforms and operators are usually linear functions.

If the book doesn't explicitly define it, just assume it means function. Read some of the proofs to see if any special properties are implicitly assumed, eg continuity or linearity.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top