Digital holography - why not 3d?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fargoth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Digital Holography
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and considerations in digital holography, particularly regarding the perception of three-dimensionality in reconstructed images. Participants explore the implications of resolution in capturing and displaying holographic images, as well as the methods used to recreate wave fronts from interference patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that after applying a Fourier transform to the interference picture, the resulting image appears two-dimensional and questions whether this is due to printer or screen resolution limitations.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the ability of any monitor or printer to achieve the necessary resolution to replicate photonic wave interference accurately.
  • A participant describes their method of splitting a laser beam into object and reference beams, explaining the process of deducing phase differences and the expectation of achieving a three-dimensional effect through optical holography.
  • One participant later corrects themselves, stating that they need to print the interference pattern rather than the processed image to achieve the desired effect, mentioning that there are printers capable of this task.
  • Another participant seeks clarification, assuming that the original intent was to print the interference pattern on transparencies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of resolution and the methods for achieving three-dimensional effects in digital holography. There is no consensus on the best approach or the limitations of current technology.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding the resolution capabilities of printers and screens, as well as the methods for reconstructing holographic images. The discussion does not resolve these technical uncertainties.

fargoth
Messages
318
Reaction score
6
after applying Fourier transform on the interference picture i get from the object ray and the reference ray (which i captured with a high definition CCD), i can see the object again... but it doesn't look like a hologram to me... its pretty 2d dimensional looking... my guess is that my printer\screen resolution is too low for the effect to take effect... am i right?

if i'd use a better printer, will i be able to see my object (almost) is three dimensions? is there a printer with a high enough resolution?
(or is it because of another factor which i didn't take into consideration?)
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think that you need to supply more details of your experiment. In any event, I seriously doubt that any monitor or printer can created the resolution needed to duplicate photonic wave interference.
 
im spliting a laser beam into an object beam and a reference beam, the object beam is reflected from an object and interferes with the reference beam on the CCD, so that now i can deduce the phase difference of the reflected object beam and recreate the wave front as if it came from the object.

in optical holography this deduction of phase difference is made by illuminating the interference picture again with the laser that was used to create the picture (and at the same angle that was used).
because i use CCD, i use Fourier transform on my picture to get the same result, mathematically it should be identicle, but i don't get the 3d effect i would have gotten by using the optical method... my CCD is accurate enough, i calculated the real optical resolution considering the airy-disc size and my CCD has more then enough, so i think i lose the effect when i try to view the picture on a computer screen or a piece of paper.
 
nevermind, i was wrong, i don't need to print the picture i get after processing the image, i need to print the interference pattern and illuminate it with the reference ray, there are printer capable of doing it.

alternatively i can produce a picture of the object from a variaty of angles on the computer using the interfernce picture.
 
Sorry, I misunderstood. I thought from the beginning that it was the interference pattern that you were trying to print. Might I assume that you're doing it on transparencies?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K