DILEMMA: Which UG program to go for?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lordargus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Program
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a high school graduate seeking advice on which engineering stream to pursue, given a strong interest in physics, particularly mechanics and cosmology. The options considered are aerospace engineering, electronics engineering, mechanical engineering, and engineering physics. The consensus suggests that while aerospace engineering aligns with interests in space and cosmology, it requires strong math skills, as it is the most math-intensive option. Additionally, aerospace engineers typically design equipment for research rather than engage in theoretical physics directly. The importance of job prospects is also highlighted, with aerospace engineering offering potential connections to astronomy and cosmology-related fields.
lordargus
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I'd really appreciate if you could spare a minute.

I've finished my high school, and have achieved a decent rank at a premier engineering institute.
Now the problem before me is this: which stream should i go for?
I have always been quite good at physics (Mechanics was my favourite), but just above par at maths.
The options are:
Aerospace engineering
Electronics engineering
Mechanical engineering
Engineering physics

I am a die hard enthusiast of cosmology and all things space, but that does kind of go off at a tangent to engineering.

Please recommend one of these four, bearing in mind job prospects, and that my interests lie towards theoretical physics, and away from electronics.

much obliged.

:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not going to see any theoretical physics in any of those 'proper' engineering programs (I'm not familiar with engineering physics to comment). That having been said, an aerospace engineer is able to work in some of the fields that deal with astronomy and cosmology, but they usually don't do research on these subjects -- normally they help design the equipment that does do the research, such as space telescopes. I'll also say that if you're wanting to go into aerospace engineering, you should beef up your math skills, because of all the disciplines of engineering on your list, I understand aerospace to be the most math-intensive (up to partial diff EQ's).
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
131
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top