Dilution & Strength: Is More Concentrated Better?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aim1732
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dilution Strength
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the strength of dilute versus concentrated acids, referencing Ostwald's dilution law, which suggests that dilute acids have a higher degree of dissociation and thus can be better electrolytes. Despite this, the pH of concentrated acids is significantly higher, leading to confusion about which is stronger. The conversation reveals a common belief that higher concentration equates to greater strength, challenging the notion that dilute acids can be stronger. Additionally, there are off-topic inquiries about posting questions in the forum. Overall, the debate highlights the complexity of acid strength and the factors influencing it.
aim1732
Messages
428
Reaction score
2
Is it right to say that a dilute acid is stronger than the same acid which has higher molarity?
By Ostwald's dilution law I can say that dissociation degree for the dilute sample is more. So it is a better electrolyte. But I also find that pH for concentrated sample is appreciably more.
Ka=(conc.)*alpha*alpha(for weak electrolytes)
So [H+]=sqrt(Ka*conc.)
Actually I can not stomach what I have heard-that a dilute acid is stronger than its concentrated counterpart. I have always thought the more concentrated the stronger it is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey! I'm very very sorry that I cannot help you with your problem but I was just wondering if you could help me out very quickly? I would like to post a question of my own but I'm having trouble finding out where to do so!
So sorry for the unhelpful post, good luck though! :)
 
SoConfused__ said:
Hey! I'm very very sorry that I cannot help you with your problem but I was just wondering if you could help me out very quickly? I would like to post a question of my own but I'm having trouble finding out where to do so!
So sorry for the unhelpful post, good luck though! :)


Never mind. Please check your Member Profile.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top