Dimension Analysis: Solving x=ut- y^{2} * z^{2} / V

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philip Wong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Dimension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the dimensional analysis of the equation x = ut - (y² * z²) / V, where x, y, and z represent length, u is speed, t is time, and V is volume. Participants analyze the consistency of dimensions on both sides of the equation, concluding that while the terms can be manipulated, the equation does not balance dimensionally. It is established that for a model to be considered consistent, all dimensions must be accounted for on both sides, even if they do not appear to balance numerically. An example is provided to illustrate a case where time is absent from one side, leading to an inconsistency. The conversation emphasizes the importance of ensuring all relevant dimensions are included in dimensional analysis.
Philip Wong
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


x=ut- y^{2} * z^{2} / V
x,y,z is length
u is speed
t is time
V is volume




The Attempt at a Solution



m = m/s * s - (m^{2} * m^{2} / m^{3})
m=m- m^{4}/m^{3}
m=m-m
m=0

there is inconsistent? is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are consistent. m-m->m
We do not know if
ut- y^{2} * z^{2} / V
is 0, but even if it is it is 0m.
 
lurflurf said:
They are consistent. m-m->m
We do not know if
ut- y^{2} * z^{2} / V
is 0, but even if it is it is 0m.

oh right! I was thinking that it was consistent at first, but i have doubt it. So I said it's inconsistent. Now you've explained it I've fully understand it.

So is it alright to assume, a model is consistent when:
no dimension is left unchecked (i.e. appears on both sides of the model), even though both sides doesn't seems to be balanced (e.g. m = m)?

for example:
using the same assumption as my question,
V = (-x^{2} * u) / t

m^{3} = m^{2}s^{-1} * ms^{-2}

m^{3} = m^{3}s^{-3}

therefore is inconsistent because time does not appears on the left hand side?
 
That is right.
 
thanks for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top