Dimension of Angle: Learn LL^-1 from Course Book

  • Thread starter Thread starter HussanAli
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Dimension
AI Thread Summary
The dimension of an angle is expressed as [LL^-1], indicating that it is dimensionless. Angles measured in radians represent the ratio of arc length to radius, which is a fundamental concept from high school geometry. Regardless of measurement units, angles maintain the same dimensionality, which is none, with only conversion factors differing. The discussion highlights a contrast in educational approaches, particularly referencing the teaching methods in Pakistan. Understanding these principles clarifies the nature of angles in mathematical contexts.
HussanAli
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
In my course I am curios to know how the dimension of angle becomes [LL^-1]. The following pic is taken by course book.



http://i42.tinypic.com/iy2y3r.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When angles are measured in radians, they are simply the ratio of arclength divided by radius ... as taught in high school geometry, at least in the USA.
 
An important note to make is that regardless of the units you're using to measure an angle, its dimensions are still the same, none. :) The only difference is a conversion factor.
 
Redbelly98 said:
When angles are measured in radians, they are simply the ratio of arclength divided by radius ... as taught in high school geometry, at least in the USA.
Thanks that helps :!) . What a damn books in Pakistan they taught.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Does Dimensionality Affect Phonon Polarizations?
Replies
1
Views
949
Torque on a Circular Current Loop under a Misaligned Magnetic Field
Replies
1
Views
945
Electric Field from a Charged Semicircular Rod
Replies
2
Views
3K
Having a hard time learning Newton's 2nd law
Replies
5
Views
2K
Solid angle in an optics problem (artificial irradiance of the Earth)
Replies
15
Views
2K
For a Pendulum: Knowing Acceleration Find Maximum Angle
Replies
26
Views
3K
Angle that makes kinetic and potential energy of simple pendulum equal
Replies
2
Views
1K
How to set up this problem with driven torsional oscillator?
Replies
5
Views
855
I Dimension of an Angle: Clarifying the SI Standard
Replies
1
Views
2K
Suggestions for HS geometry book (proofs)
Replies
14
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top