dioib
- 11
- 0
How do we know that the (effective) dimensionality of "space" is three in a typical physical theory?
The discussion centers around the dimensionality of space, specifically questioning how we can ascertain that it is effectively three dimensions within typical physical theories. The scope includes theoretical implications, measurements, and physical predictions related to dimensionality.
Participants express both agreement on the reasoning behind three-dimensionality and disagreement regarding the implications of higher dimensions, particularly in high-energy physics contexts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effects of perception on measurements and predictions.
There are limitations in the assumptions made about the macroscopic versus microscopic domains, as well as the potential for energy-dependent dimensionality that remains unresolved.
tom.stoer said:a) because we see it
b) because we can measure it, e.g. via the Coulomb law which shows a behaviour like U(r) ~ r-(D-2)
c) because there are a huge number of physical predictions depending on the dimensionality (besides the Coulomb law there are the gravitational potential, diffusion processes, ...)
yes i have the same confusiondioib said:Thank you for breaking it down into parts:
a') Because we can't see/perceive "further/higher".
b',c') Taking (a'), how can I make sure it will not affect (b,c)?