Dimensional Analysis: Matrix Setup for M/(L^2T^2)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on setting up a matrix to combine units of M(L^2)/T and L^4 to achieve units of M/(L^2T^2). Participants express confusion over the problem's clarity and the correct matrix representation. A suggested matrix setup is presented, but issues arise regarding the dimensions and the validity of the multiplication. It is noted that the equation may not have a solution unless additional parameters are introduced or corrections made to the matrix. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise problem formulation in dimensional analysis.
princejan7
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How do I set up a matrix to find the combination of ( M(L^2)/T ) and I ( L^4)
that results in units of M/ ( L^2 T^2 ) ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I think it looks something like
[ 1 0
2 4
-2 0 ]
*
[ a1, a2, a3]
=
[1 -2 -2]

but the dimensions of those matrices aren't right
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given:

Y = M * X

Are you trying to get a vector Y with units of measure of M / ( L^2 T^2 ) from a vector X with units of measure M(L^2)/T multiplied with matrix M? or is this a dot product?
 
princejan7 said:

Homework Statement


How do I set up a matrix to find the combination of ( M(L^2)/T ) and I ( L^4)
that results in units of M/ ( L^2 T^2 ) ?

That statement of the problem isn't clear. (What would "a combination" mean in this context? ) Try stating the problem as it is actually worded.

I think it looks something like

Matrices can't be reliably displayed using ordinary typing. You can resort to LaTex https://www.physicsforums.com/help/latexhelp/ In the meantime, it might be better to use notation like [1,2,-2]^T to denote a column vector.

To have valid multiplication In your work you'd have to multiply on the left by the row vector:

\begin{bmatrix}a_1&a_2&a_3 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}1&0\\2&4\\-2&0 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} 1\\-2\\-2 \end{bmatrix}

but I don't know if that equation is appropriate, because I don't know what problem you are solving.

Are you trying work a problem similar to the examples shown in the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckingham_π_theorem ?
 
jedishfru, Steven,

princejan7 is trying to solve ##\left(\frac {ML^2}T \right)^{a_1}\left(L^4\right)^{a_2} = \frac M{L^2T^2}##. This leads to the matrix equation shown...
except there is no a3, the a1, a2 should be a column vector, and either the problem has been stated incorrectly or the -2 at lower left of the matrix should be -1.
## \begin{bmatrix}1&0\\2&4\\-1&0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}a_1&a_2 \end{bmatrix}^T= \begin{bmatrix} 1\\-2\\-2 \end{bmatrix}##
Note: there is no solution. princejan7 , is there perhaps some third input parameter? Or is the -2 right in the matrix (which would permit a solution)?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top