Is the API Hydrocarbon Emission Formula Dimensionally Consistent?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dimensional consistency of the hydrocarbon emission formula provided by the American Petroleum Institute. Concerns are raised about the term (p/(14.7-p))^0.68, questioning whether it is dimensionless due to the presence of atmospheric pressure. Participants note that formulas often require specific units for accurate application and that constants in formulas typically have no units. The distinction between equations and formulas is emphasized, highlighting the importance of unit consistency when interpreting results. Overall, the conversation underscores the need for careful consideration of units in scientific formulas.
popoff
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The American Petroleum Institute has published a correlation for determining the hydrocarbon emissions from fixed-roof storage tanks

Ly = (24/1000) * (p/(14.7-p))^0.68 * D^1.73 * H^0.51 * T^0.5 * Fp * C

where: Ly is breathing emissions, bbl/yr; p is the true vapor pressure at the bulk temperature, psia; D is the tank diameter, ft; H is the height in ft; T is the average tank outage corrected for roof volume, ft; Fp is the dimensionless paint factor; and C is the dimensionless adjustment factor.

Is this equation dimensionally consistent?

Homework Equations


Unit conversions

The Attempt at a Solution


I have a doubt with the (p/(14.7-p))^0.68 term. I think it should be dimensionless, but I am not totally sure as there is a 14.7 with no units minus a pressure in psia...
 
  • Like
Likes ayeshanaved23
Physics news on Phys.org
popoff said:
... as there is a 14.7 with no units minus a pressure in psia...
What is atmospheric pressure in psi?
 
popoff said:
I have a doubt with the (p/(14.7-p))^0.68 term. I think it should be dimensionless, but I am not totally sure as there is a 14.7 with no units minus a pressure in psia...
It's terms like that that indicate that this is not an equation, but a formula. There are many such formulas for different disciplines, typically compiled into handbooks, where you must enter the variable values as dimensionless magnitudes of quantities that are given in specific units. A formula is "true" only so long as you specify all quantities in the required units and don't entry the units :smile:

A formula's constants typically have no units so you can't trivially "translate" the formula to work with other units, and since you have to interpret the result of the formula in particular units you can't just treat the expression as an equation and "solve" for any of the variables in terms of the others without putting some thought into what you're doing.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top