Dimensional analysis to determine unknown exponents

AI Thread Summary
Dimensional analysis is applied to determine the unknown exponents l, m, and n in the equation λ = k μ^l f^m T^n, leading to the conclusion that l = -1/2, m = -1, and n = 1/2. The dimensions of the terms are established, with λ as length [L], f as [L]^-1, T as [M][L][T]^-2, and μ as [M][L]^-1. The resulting dimensional equations are set up for [L], [T], and [M], leading to three simultaneous equations. The user initially struggles with the next steps but realizes that solving these equations will yield the values of the exponents. The discussion highlights the process of using dimensional analysis to derive relationships between physical quantities.
Vasili
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Use the method of Dimensional Analysis to show that the unknown exponents in Equation (1) are l=-1/2, m=-1, and n=1/2.

Homework Equations


Equation (1) is \lambda = k \mu ^{l} f ^{m} T^{n}

Where:
\lambda is the wavelength;
f is the frequency of the sound;
T is the tension in the string;
\mu is the mass per unit length of the string.
k is a dimensionless constant.

The Attempt at a Solution


The dimensions for the above terms should be:
\lambda = [L] (Simple enough)
f=[L] ^{-1} (Since the frequency is the inverse of time. Is this correct?)
T=[M][L][T] ^{-2} (Since the tension in the rope is just the force exerted on it, right?)
\mu = [M][L] ^{-1} (Since it is the mass per unit length)

Which gives the dimensional equation as:
[L]=([M] \cdot [L]^{-1}) ^{l} \cdot ([T] ^{-1}) ^{m} \cdot ([M] \cdot [L] \cdot [T]^{-2})^{n}

Which can be used to make equations for [L], [T], and [M], respectively:

1=-1l + 1n ([L]) (i)
0=-1m - 2n ([T]) (ii)
0=1l + 1n ([M]) (iii)

And from here I don't know where to go. If I manipulate (ii) to state n in terms of m, I get n=-1/2m. But where do I go from here? I need to solve these three equations simultaneously?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, I got it. Sorry, I keep doing this with my posts here. XD
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top