Dimensions that are not space dimensions nor time dimensions.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of dimensions beyond the traditional space and time dimensions, suggesting that while our physical universe is typically described by these two, there are infinite mathematical and conceptual dimensions. The conversation highlights the ambiguity in defining dimensions, noting that some argue time may not share the same properties as spatial dimensions. It is proposed that there could be dimensions we cannot perceive, which might still influence our reality, akin to a two-dimensional world existing in a three-dimensional space. Theoretical possibilities, such as a fourth spatial dimension, are acknowledged, although the conversation warns against veering into speculation without scientific backing. Ultimately, the nature of dimensions remains a complex topic with both mathematical and physical implications.
Dremmer
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Can dimensions exist that are not space dimensions nor time dimensions? I was just curious.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Well, I think those are the only two that describe our physical universe, yes.

However, depending on your definition of exist, there are an infinite number of mathematical dimensions and conceptual dimensions.
 
Do you not also need mass, [STRIKE]length[/STRIKE] charge and temperature to complete the currently acknowledged set?

edit to hasty in my list sorry.
 
Last edited:
Studiot said:
Do you not also need mass, length and temperature to complete the currently acknowledged set?
It's a terminology issue. Some don't consider time to be a dimension either, since it doesn't share the same properties as spatial dimensions. The state of an object can include many aspects which aren't related to dimensions, such as it's color.

In math or programming, dimensions are abstract and not required to be related to spatial dimensions. For example, each field in a database could be considered a dimension and as an index into some huge tensor.
 
Any variable (number) can be said to be a "dimension". That's loosely the mathematical and true meaning of the word "dimension".

In physics, it's just often assumed that "dimension" is short for "spatial dimension". This is not really a correct way to use the word.
 
As far as I know, spacetime is considered to consist of something like 11 or 12 dimensions. Since I am physically capable of experiencing only 4 of them, the rest just don't matter to me.
 
Danger said:
As far as I know, spacetime is considered to consist of something like 11 or 12 dimensions. Since I am physically capable of experiencing only 4 of them, the rest just don't matter to me.

We all fall into this special recognition of experience...trap.

One theory is the 5th dimension is all possibilities that occur in your 4th dimension. Specially you can kind of visualize that but tbh i think its a bit far off the real fabric of existence
 
Christov84 said:
One theory is the 5th dimension

I love their music, but have never considered them a source of physics training. :biggrin:
Actually, I agree with you. I am not capable of experiencing more than the basic 4 dimensions, but that doesn't mean that I don't believe in others. My contention is that since a human brain is a 4-dimensional object, it is inherently incapable of "visualizing" other dimensions. That might not be correct, but I've never seen any evidence to the contrary.
 
Danger said:
I am not capable of experiencing more than the basic 4 dimensions...
You may well be experiencing them every waking moment, they may just be below the threshold of your macroscopic senses. Everytime you wave your arms, it may be passing through a half dozen of these tiny-curled up dimensions but the effect is too small for you to notice.
 
  • #10
That's a damned good point, Dave; one which never crossed my mind before. I might inadvertently influence something that I am unaware of.
Now I have to wonder if I'm killing someone every time that I fart.
 
  • #11
Danger said:
Now I have to wonder if I'm killing someone every time that I fart.
:smile:

There was a doubt? :biggrin:
 
  • #12
DaveC426913 said:
:smile:

There was a doubt? :biggrin:

:confused:
 
  • #13
Dremmer said:
Can dimensions exist that are not space dimensions nor time dimensions? I was just curious.

Yes. Theoretically, there can be dimensions that we cannot perceive, but can still affect us. Take this for example: Suppose we existed in a 2 dimensional world, and we had no concept of up or down. In essence, our universe would be a flat disk in which everything existed on its surface. Now suppose that the disk was moving in the 3rd dimension through some medium--that is, it was moving up or down. Such an act could cause forces that we would only perceive in two dimensions and could not explain.

That in mind, it is possible there's a 4th spatial dimension. Who's to say our universe is not hurtling through space along some imperceivable axis?
 
  • #14
Renaatier said:
Yes. Theoretically, there can be dimensions that we cannot perceive, but can still affect us. Take this for example: Suppose we existed in a 2 dimensional world, and we had no concept of up or down. In essence, our universe would be a flat disk in which everything existed on its surface. Now suppose that the disk was moving in the 3rd dimension through some medium--that is, it was moving up or down. Such an act could cause forces that we would only perceive in two dimensions and could not explain.

That in mind, it is possible there's a 4th spatial dimension. Who's to say our universe is not hurtling through space along some imperceivable axis?

When you use the example of a 2 dimensional world floating in a 3 dimensional medium, the 3rd dimension is of space and so does not explain the question :D
 
  • #15
Besides the fact that this thread is several months old before it got revived, there is a potential that it is going to meander into highly-speculative areas. I will remind everyone of the PF Rules that you had agreed to, especially on speculative posts. Do NOT post your personal opinion if it isn't already published, or backed by published papers (you should know what we mean by "published" from the Rules).

Zz.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top