Dinosaur Tomb Raider: Robert A. DePalma & Impact Evidence

  • Thread starter Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Robert A. DePalma, a curator at the Palm Beach Museum of Natural History, discovered a significant fossil deposit in North Dakota, revealing evidence of a meteor impact's aftermath. Findings include fish with tektites in their gills, burned vegetation, and disturbed dinosaur remains, suggesting a rapid sequence of events following the Yucatan impact. Seismic waves likely created a mud slurry, while molten rock re-entered the atmosphere, causing fires and forming tektites found in the sediment. The subsequent tsunami, although delayed, may have buried the remains under a sediment layer marked by iridium, indicative of the K-T boundary. This research, set for publication in PNAS, has generated excitement and discussion among paleontologists and enthusiasts alike.
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
2,681
Reaction score
11,657
Robert A. DePalma, a 37 year old curator of paleontology at the Palm Beach Museum of Natural History, in Florida, as well as a graduate student at the University of Kansas discovered and started mining a huge fossil deposit found in North Dakota (to be published next week in PNAS) in 2012. The findings include fish with small tektites in their gills (sturgeon and paddlefish), broken and burned vegetation, tektites preserved in amber (fossilized plant resin), some land dinosaurs in a disturbed layer of fine sediments and mud.

Recently the impact events in the Yucatan have been described in a fair amount of detail.

This new yet-to-be-publication (described in stories from the NY Times, The New Yorker magazine, and a UC, Berkeley news release.

It looks like the series of events went like this:
Meteor impact in Yucatan area produces:
  • Siezmic waves
  • Mega-Tsunami in S. Gulf of Mexico,
  • much molten/vaporized rock, launched into space.
Seismic waves might be expected to get there in 10 minutes. This may have shaken up a body of freshwater, making a mud slurry, with fish and other things from land that ended up in there (sounds lke it was something like a lake that got drained).

Some of the lofted rock material started falling back to Earth (all over the world, heating up on reentry and possibly starting fires) and eventually solidifying into tektites. These were found in the dead animal mud mix and in some cases in the gills of filter feeding fish (paddlefish), indicating they were filtering them out of the water. This is though to have happened with in 45-60 minutes after the impact.

A Tsunami from the impact area (about 3,000 kilometers away) would normally take 10-12 hours to go that far. It could possibly have gotten to the area because there was an extension of the Gulf of Mexico extending north to that area (see map in NY Times pub), but it would have taken too long to match with other events. Maybe this was the cause of the last part, where a big water disturbance then buried the mud/dead animals/tektite assemble under another layer of sediment.

Over that was a top iridium containing layer, a pretty definitive marker of the K-T boundary. Iridium came from vaporized meteor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Love
Likes Klystron, hutchphd, Truecrimson and 8 others
Biology news on Phys.org
My Facebook Paleontologist friends have been all atwitter about this for the last couple of days. The BBC article looked marginally interesting, but then I read the New Yorker article.

It was a series of "WOW" moments for me.

And I'm not a paleontologist.

ps. I searched the forum yesterday, wondering if anyone was interested in such things. Apparently, the lack of "Chicxulub" boogered my search attempts.

I also made the mistake of perusing the "Earth Sciences" forum.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and BillTre
I don't often use "Chicxulub" since its not a word I feel good about spelling.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Steelwolf and OmCheeto
BillTre said:
I don't often use "Chicxulub" since its not a word I feel good about spelling.
I spent 10 minutes yesterday on some "How do you pronounce that?" site.
I decided you can pronounce it any way you like.

ps. After 2 days of semi-intensive study of this topic, I've decided I will never know how to spell Chicxulub, without googling it.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
OmCheeto said:
I spent 10 minutes yesterday on some "How do you pronounce that?" site.
I decided you can pronounce it any way you like.

ps. After 2 days of semi-intensive study of this topic, I've decided I will never know how to spell Chicxulub, without googling it.

Yes this is the sort of stuff that gets me excited
 
  • Haha
Likes OmCheeto
No really!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top