Dipole - the calc. seems a bit illogical though correct

  • Thread starter Thread starter exuberant.me
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bit Dipole
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the electric field due to a dipole at a point P, where the initial interpretation of the calculation seemed illogical. The calculation involves breaking the dipole moment into components, applying the formula E = kp/r³, and combining the x and y components. Initially, there was confusion about the direction of the net electric field, but it was clarified that the electric field indeed has both x- and y-components. The correct understanding is that the components correspond to different geometrical configurations: one along the axial line and the other in the equatorial plane. Ultimately, the confusion was resolved through careful examination of the problem.
exuberant.me
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
I was reading the calculation for calculating the electric field due to a dipole at any point P at a distance x from the center of the dipole.

the way they have written the calc. seems a bit illogical

they have broken p into two components pcosθ and psinθ and applied E = kp/r3

Now,


E = Ex + Ey = (kpcosθ)/r3i + (kpsinθ)/r3j

but that would give the net field along some other direction..

it should rather only be

E = Ex = (kpcosθ)/r3

If someone can explain..!
Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why? The electric field has both an x- and a y-component.
 
i got it cleared at last... actually there was a different problem i faced.. but could not express it here...
btw.. i got it cleared by looking carefully..
they have done the right thing.. for first one it lies on the axial line and for second component it lies on equitorial plane.. i could not focus on this thing... thanks a lot.. !
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top