A Dirac Delta Function in Cross Section Formula (Peskin Schroeder QFT)

Click For Summary
In the discussion regarding the Dirac delta function in the cross section formula from Peskin and Schroeder's QFT, the delta function appears in the context of deriving the relationship between particle momenta. The equation indicates that the delta function enforces the condition that the longitudinal momentum of particle A, denoted as ##\bar{k}^z_A##, must equal its initial value ##k^z_A##. The manipulation of the function ##F(\bar{k}^z_A)## reveals a quadratic equation, suggesting the possibility of a second solution, denoted as ##K##. However, the constraints imposed by the delta function and the perpendicular momentum conditions imply that only the solution ##\bar{k}^z_A = k^z_A## is valid. The discussion emphasizes the uniqueness of this solution under the given constraints, clarifying any potential misunderstandings about the existence of alternative solutions.
DOTDO
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
In Peskin and Schroeder's QFT book, while deriving the cross section formula for particles ##A## and ##B##, a Dirac delta appears in Eq 4.77:
\begin{align}
\nonumber
\int d\bar{k}^z_A \,
\left.
\delta ( F ( \bar{k}^z_A ) )
\right\vert_{\bar{k}^\perp_A = k^\perp_A, \, \bar{k}^\perp_B = k^\perp_B}
=
\frac{1}{\left\vert\frac{\bar{k}^z_A}{\bar{E}_A}-\frac{\bar{k}^z_B}{\bar{E}_B}\right\vert},
\end{align}
where
\begin{equation}
\nonumber
F ( \bar{k}^z_A ) =
\sqrt{(\bar{k}^\perp_A)^2+(\bar{k}^z_A)^2+m^2_A}
+ \sqrt{(\bar{k}^\perp_B)^2+(k^z_A+k^z_B - \bar{k}^z_A)^2+m^2_B}
\
-\sqrt{(k^\perp_A)^2+(k^z_A)^2+m^2_A}
-\sqrt{(k^\perp_B)^2+(k^z_B)^2+m^2_B}.
\end{equation}
Because of the delta function, this result comes together with the constraint
\begin{equation}
\nonumber
\bar{k}^z_A=k^z_A.
\end{equation}
In Eq 4.78 on the next page, this result is used to exchange the variables ##\bar{k}^z_A## and ##\bar{k}^z_B = k^z_A+k^z_B-\bar{k}^z_A## in terms of ##k^z_A##. For example,
\begin{equation}
\nonumber
\frac{1}{\sqrt{E_A\bar{E}_A}} \phi_A(\vec{k}_A) \phi^\star_A(\vec{\bar{k}}_A)
=
\frac{\vert\phi_A(\vec{k}_A)\vert^2}{E_A}.
\end{equation}
I know how to deal with a composition of Dirac delta with a function, and it is clear that ##F(\bar{k}^z_A)## has a zero at ##k^z_A##. However, by manipulating ##F(\bar{k}^z_A)##, we can get a quadratic equation of ##\bar{k}^z_A##, and there is one another solution. Let's denote the second solution by ##K##. Then, the first equation above should give
\begin{align}
\nonumber
\frac{1}{\left\vert\frac{\bar{k}^z_A}{\bar{E}_A}-\frac{k^z_A+k^z_B-\bar{k}^z_A}{\bar{E}_B}\right\vert} \times \left( \bar{k}^z_A = k^z_A\right)
+
\frac{1}{\left\vert\frac{\bar{k}^z_A}{\bar{E}_A}-\frac{k^z_A+k^z_B-\bar{k}^z_A}{\bar{E}_B}\right\vert}\times \left( \bar{k}^z_A =K \right).
\end{align}
That is, the constraints are not given as independent options. They are summed together so it is impossible to choose one of them as we want. But as you can see in Eq 4.78, they take only one solution ##\bar{k}^z_A = k^z_A##.

What am I misunderstanding?
 
  • Like
Likes SX Zhao and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
It's been a time since you posted the question. I met a derivation recently which I think is kind of similar to your question. As for ##F(\bar{k}_{A}^{z})## you wrote, if we have constraints ##\bar{k}_{A}^{\perp}=k_{A}^{\perp}## and ##\bar{k}_{B}^{\perp}=k_{B}^{\perp}##, I don't think there is any other solution than ##\bar{k}_{A}^{z}=k_{A}^{z}##.
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
58
Views
6K