A Dirac Delta Function in Cross Section Formula (Peskin Schroeder QFT)

DOTDO
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
In Peskin and Schroeder's QFT book, while deriving the cross section formula for particles ##A## and ##B##, a Dirac delta appears in Eq 4.77:
\begin{align}
\nonumber
\int d\bar{k}^z_A \,
\left.
\delta ( F ( \bar{k}^z_A ) )
\right\vert_{\bar{k}^\perp_A = k^\perp_A, \, \bar{k}^\perp_B = k^\perp_B}
=
\frac{1}{\left\vert\frac{\bar{k}^z_A}{\bar{E}_A}-\frac{\bar{k}^z_B}{\bar{E}_B}\right\vert},
\end{align}
where
\begin{equation}
\nonumber
F ( \bar{k}^z_A ) =
\sqrt{(\bar{k}^\perp_A)^2+(\bar{k}^z_A)^2+m^2_A}
+ \sqrt{(\bar{k}^\perp_B)^2+(k^z_A+k^z_B - \bar{k}^z_A)^2+m^2_B}
\
-\sqrt{(k^\perp_A)^2+(k^z_A)^2+m^2_A}
-\sqrt{(k^\perp_B)^2+(k^z_B)^2+m^2_B}.
\end{equation}
Because of the delta function, this result comes together with the constraint
\begin{equation}
\nonumber
\bar{k}^z_A=k^z_A.
\end{equation}
In Eq 4.78 on the next page, this result is used to exchange the variables ##\bar{k}^z_A## and ##\bar{k}^z_B = k^z_A+k^z_B-\bar{k}^z_A## in terms of ##k^z_A##. For example,
\begin{equation}
\nonumber
\frac{1}{\sqrt{E_A\bar{E}_A}} \phi_A(\vec{k}_A) \phi^\star_A(\vec{\bar{k}}_A)
=
\frac{\vert\phi_A(\vec{k}_A)\vert^2}{E_A}.
\end{equation}
I know how to deal with a composition of Dirac delta with a function, and it is clear that ##F(\bar{k}^z_A)## has a zero at ##k^z_A##. However, by manipulating ##F(\bar{k}^z_A)##, we can get a quadratic equation of ##\bar{k}^z_A##, and there is one another solution. Let's denote the second solution by ##K##. Then, the first equation above should give
\begin{align}
\nonumber
\frac{1}{\left\vert\frac{\bar{k}^z_A}{\bar{E}_A}-\frac{k^z_A+k^z_B-\bar{k}^z_A}{\bar{E}_B}\right\vert} \times \left( \bar{k}^z_A = k^z_A\right)
+
\frac{1}{\left\vert\frac{\bar{k}^z_A}{\bar{E}_A}-\frac{k^z_A+k^z_B-\bar{k}^z_A}{\bar{E}_B}\right\vert}\times \left( \bar{k}^z_A =K \right).
\end{align}
That is, the constraints are not given as independent options. They are summed together so it is impossible to choose one of them as we want. But as you can see in Eq 4.78, they take only one solution ##\bar{k}^z_A = k^z_A##.

What am I misunderstanding?
 
  • Like
Likes SX Zhao and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
It's been a time since you posted the question. I met a derivation recently which I think is kind of similar to your question. As for ##F(\bar{k}_{A}^{z})## you wrote, if we have constraints ##\bar{k}_{A}^{\perp}=k_{A}^{\perp}## and ##\bar{k}_{B}^{\perp}=k_{B}^{\perp}##, I don't think there is any other solution than ##\bar{k}_{A}^{z}=k_{A}^{z}##.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top