Dirac's explanation of negative energy states

paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
I wonder whether Dirac explanation of paradox of negative energy solutions
of his equation is viable. Of course this paradox is absent in QFT but if
we treat Dirac equation as an equation for wave function of electron
the negative energy solution are a puzzle. Acording to Dirac we don't
observe negative energy particles because all states with negative energy are
occupied. What we observe is a "hole in negative energy see". However
for stability of vacuum we have to additionally assume that the described particles
are fermions (states with some electrons are stable as all states with lower energy
are occupied and two electrons cannot occupy the same state). If we consider
the Klein-Gordon equation describing scalar particles (bosons) the Dirac's explanation
doesn't work. So in my opinion it's impossible to consistently explain the negative
energy solutions of relativistic wave equations not using formalism of QFT
(the filed then becomes an operator which destroys and creates particles).
So Dirac "hole in a see" argument has only historical meaning.
Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes you are right. but for more explanation you can refer to quantum mechanics by schiff
,there he has elaborately given.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top