Direction of motion if there are two unequal opposite forces

AI Thread Summary
When a particle is at rest on the ground and an upward force is applied that produces an acceleration of 4.9 m/s², it will not move upward due to the downward gravitational acceleration of 9.8 m/s². To initiate upward motion, the applied force must exceed the gravitational force, requiring a net positive force greater than 9.8 m/s². If the force is less than the weight of the object, it will remain stationary. Additionally, in free fall, a momentary upward force will only slow the object down rather than reverse its direction. Ultimately, it is the net force that determines the acceleration and direction of motion.
NoahCygnus
Messages
96
Reaction score
2
If a particle is in the state of rest on the ground , and I apply a force such that it produces an acceleration 4.9 ##\frac{m}{s^2}## upward , will it move upward , considering there's gravitational acceleration 9.8 ##\frac{m}{s^2}## in the downward direction, or will it remain at rest?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the force produces that acceleration, then it must move. But it takes a force of ## (9.8 + 4.9)m ## Newton to do this with a mass ##m##. Any force less than ##mg## and it doesn't move.
 
BvU said:
If the force produces that acceleration, then it must move. But it takes a force of ## (9.8 + 4.9)m ## Newton to do this with a mass ##m##. Any force less than ##mg## and it doesn't move.
So it takes a force which produces an acceleration greater than 9.8 m/s^2 in opposite direction to gravitational acceleration to move the body in upward direction?
 
The net force on the object must be positive (upward direction) for it to start moving in that direction, if it was initially at rest. If the body were free falling (and thus subject exclusively to gravity), a momentary application of a net positive force will slow it down (reduce its speed) but won't make it instantaneously start going up. This is a common misconception; it is the velocity vector which tells you in which direction the body is moving, not the acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes NoahCygnus
NoahCygnus said:
So it takes a force which produces an acceleration greater than 9.8 m/s^2 in opposite direction to gravitational acceleration to move the body in upward direction?
To keep an object in place in a gravitation field it takes a force ##mg## to produce no acceleration whatsoever. It just compensates the gravity force. As Joe says, it's the net force that causes the acceleration.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top