Direction of pressure on a multiple liquid manometer

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the directionality of pressure in a multiple liquid manometer, focusing on how to determine positive and negative pressure changes at various points in the system. The scope includes theoretical concepts, mathematical reasoning, and practical application related to fluid mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about defining the direction of pressure at changing points in a manometer, despite having a solution.
  • Another participant asserts that pressure does not have direction, suggesting it is a scalar quantity.
  • A participant clarifies that pressure is continuous across interfaces in the fluid, questioning if that aligns with the original inquiry.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of pressure being a vector or scalar, with references to Pascal's Law and the nature of pressure as a dot product of force and area.
  • There are discussions about how to assign positive and negative signs to pressure changes based on movement through the fluid, with specific references to depth changes.
  • A participant requests clarification on how to label heights and pressures in a diagram related to the manometer.
  • Another participant describes a step-by-step approach to calculating pressures at various points, emphasizing the importance of directionality in these calculations.
  • There is a suggestion that the same method of determining pressure changes can be applied to each interface point, depending on whether the movement is upward or downward.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether pressure has direction, with some asserting it does not while others argue it acts perpendicular to surfaces. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the conceptual understanding of pressure directionality and its implications for calculations in the manometer.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings about the nature of pressure as a scalar versus vector quantity, and the need for clarity on how to apply pressure changes in calculations based on movement through the fluid.

Sollicitans
Messages
29
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



no1KCFJ.jpg


Homework Equations


P=ρgh

The Attempt at a Solution


I already have the solution.

My question is simple. I can't understand how I define the direction of pressure in each "changing" point. I also have the solution if needed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pressure doesn't have direction.
 
The pressure is continuous across the interface at each changing point. Is that what you meant?

Chet
 
Okay, although another lecturer pointed out that pressure should be a vector, I shouldn't mention the word direction - you are right.
If I rephrase it to "how to find out if pressure is positive or negative"? Does it make sense now?

Here's the solution. I can't understand how I define where I put + and where I put -
υδ stand for water, ελ for oil and υδρ for mercury. ρ is density
GbSJfCZ.jpg
 
Pascal's Law explicitly mentions that " pressure exerted anywhere in a confined incompressible fluid is transmitted equally in all directions throughout the fluid such that the pressure variations (initial differences) remain the same". So, even if pressure did have a direction (it doesn't, it is a dot product of Force and Area on which the force acts) it wouldn't matter if it was positive or negative.
 
Sollicitans said:
Okay, although another lecturer pointed out that pressure should be a vector, I shouldn't mention the word direction - you are right.
If I rephrase it to "how to find out if pressure is positive or negative"? Does it make sense now?

Here's the solution. I can't understand how I define where I put + and where I put -
υδ stand for water, ελ for oil and υδρ for mercury. ρ is density
GbSJfCZ.jpg
If you are moving downward to get the pressure change, you use a plus sign, and if you are moving upward to get the pressure change, you use a minus sign. This is because pressure increases as depth increases, and decreases as depth decreases.
 
Tamojit Maiti said:
Pascal's Law explicitly mentions that " pressure exerted anywhere in a confined incompressible fluid is transmitted equally in all directions throughout the fluid such that the pressure variations (initial differences) remain the same". So, even if pressure did have a direction (it doesn't, it is a dot product of Force and Area on which the force acts) it wouldn't matter if it was positive or negative.
Pressure does have direction in the sense that it acts in the direction perpendicular to every surface upon which it acts. This is because, in reality, pressure is an isotropic second order tensor which, when dotted with a normal to the surface, yields a vector (force per unit area) normal to the surface.

Chet
 
Tamojit Maiti said:
Pascal's Law explicitly mentions that " pressure exerted anywhere in a confined incompressible fluid is transmitted equally in all directions throughout the fluid such that the pressure variations (initial differences) remain the same". So, even if pressure did have a direction (it doesn't, it is a dot product of Force and Area on which the force acts) it wouldn't matter if it was positive or negative.

This conversation is off-topic. As a student, I don't have the knowledge to support or disprove my lecturer's opinion.

Chestermiller said:
If you are moving downward to get the pressure change, you use a plus sign, and if you are moving upward to get the pressure change, you use a minus sign. This is because pressure increases as depth increases, and decreases as depth decreases.
Can you explain again? I don't see what "moving" upwards or downwards means. Does it have to do with the heights?

I remember the professor saying we should imagine how the fluid would move if the others weren't there - in case this helps you help me.
 
I want you to go back to the figure, and label some more heights (distances) in the figure:

Label h4 the distance from the bottom of the h2 section to the point where the tube is joined to be big tank.

Label h5 the distance from the top of h1 to the top of the U tube section containing the oil.

Label h6 the distance from the bottom of h3 to the bottom of the U tube section containing the mercury.

I also want you to label some more pressures on the figure.

Label p3 the pressure at the junction between the tube and the tank.

Label p4 the pressure in the tube at the boundary between the water and the oil.

Label p5 the pressure in the oil at the very top of the U.

Label p6 the pressure in the tube at the boundary between the oil and the mercury.

Label p7 the pressure at the bottom of the U containing the mercury.

Get back with me when you get done with this, and I will help you to continue.

Chet
 
  • #10
Here it is. Sorry but I don't have time to make it look more "neat".
KSE38Y5.jpg

Now, I'm afraid you'll explain it a way I possibly won't understand because it may contain information I don't know how to work with. But I will gladly read it carefully, so go on.
 
  • #11
OK. But before we begin, please repeat after me: I think I can, I think I can, I think I can,...

I'm going to do part of the problem, show you what to do, and then I'm going to let you continue.

I know that, when I'm in a swimming pool, as I swim down to the bottom, the water pressure increases, and, as I swim back up to the top, the water pressure decreases. So, going from a higher point to a lower point, I get an increase in pressure, and going from a lower point to a higher point, I get a decrease in pressure.

Now, I'm going to start out at point 1, where the pressure is p1. At this location the pressure in the water just near the surface is equal to the air pressure in the head space of the tank. Now, I want to go down to point 3 where the pressure is p3. I know that point 3 is below point 1; the distance below is (h1+h2+h4). Since I have to go downward to get from point 1 to point 3, the pressure at point 3 is:$$p_3=p_1+ρ_{water}g(h_1+h_2+h_4)$$

Next I want to get p4. I know that point 4 is above point 3; the distance above is ##(h_2+h_4)##. Since I have to move upward to get from point 3 to point 4, the pressure at point 4 is:$$p_4=p_3-ρ_{water}g(h_2+h_4)$$
Now I have the pressure at the interface between the water and the oil.

Next, I'm going to move upward through the oil to get the pressure at point 5. I know that point 5 is above point 4; the distance above is ##(h_1+h_5)##. Since I have to move upward to get from point 4 to point 5, the pressure at point 5 is:
$$p_5=p_4-ρ_{oil}g(h_1+h_5)$$

Next, I want to get the pressure at point 6, which represents the interface between the oil and the mercury. Is point 6 above or below point 5? What is the distance between point 5 and point 6? Since I have to move downward to get from point 5 to point 6, is the pressure at point 6 higher or lower than the pressure at point 5? In terms of the pressure at point 5, the density of the oil, and the distance between points 5 and 6, what is the pressure at point 6?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule
  • #12
We move downward and the distance is (h1+h2+h5). Pressure at point 6 must be p6=p5 + ρoilg(h1+h2+h5).Is it safe to assume I can do the same for each one of the 3 interface points? See if I'm moving upwards or downwards and use the corresponding sign?
 
  • #13
Sollicitans said:
We move downward and the distance is (h1+h2+h5). Pressure at point 6 must be p6=p5 + ρoilg(h1+h2+h5).Is it safe to assume I can do the same for each one of the 3 interface points? See if I'm moving upwards or downwards and use the corresponding sign?
I think you've got it. The last step is to add up all your equations together and see what you get. This will eliminate all the pressures except p1 and p2.

Chet
 
  • #14
Chestermiller said:
I think you've got it. The last step is to add up all your equations together and see what you get. This will eliminate all the pressures except p1 and p2.

Chet
Thanks a lot for helping me. I'll come back in case I face another problem :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K