Discontinuity of electric field at surface of a conductor

In summary, the discontinuity of the electric field at the surface of a conductor is due to the presence of charges on both sides of the surface, which results in a cancelation of the electric field on the inside of the conductor. This leads to a magnitude of σ/ε for the electric field immediately outside the conductor.
  • #1
ThereIam
65
0
Hi all,

So I've been reviewing for the PGRE at the end of next month (wish me luck, I'm going to need it) and I stumbled across something that confused me in my old textbook. I was reading about the discontinuity of the electric field at the surface of a conductor, and also about the strength of the electric field immediately outside of a conductor. Here is what puzzles me:

So as I understand it the discontinuity of the electric field (which has magnitude σ/ε) is due to the fact that the electric field outside the conductor is is equal to σ/2ε on both sides of the surface of a conductor in opposite directions. This is just what you get when you assume your point is very close to the surface and thus get to treat the surface of the conductor as a plane of charge. That's all fine and good, but then the next section argues that since the electric field must be 0 inside (once the conductor has reached electrostatic equilibrium) and the discontinuity of the electric field is σ/ε as just proven, the electric field immediately outside the conductor must actually be σ/ε. Wait a minute! We just said it was σ/2ε outside! And we said that just inside in the opposite direction it was σ/2ε, talking as though there were actually a field immediately within.

What's going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are mixing two different cases.
1) A plane where you don't care about its (small) thickness, and charge density σ.
2) A plane with finite width, where you consider the charge density on both sides separately. If you want to compare this to case 1, let σ/2 be on both sides, and the results are consistent again.
 
  • #3
Turns out that the field produced by the local charge density is indeed σ/2ε pointing outwards just outside of the conductor surface and σ/2ε pointing inwards just inside of the conductor surface. But that's not the whole story. There is also the field produce by all the other charges present in the conductor. Those far charges produce a field σ/2ε pointing outwards on both sides of the surface. On the inside the two fields cancel each other out while on the inside they add up to σ/ε.
 
  • #4
Thank you for the replies. Dauto's response makes a bit more sense to me. mfb, in both cases I was referring to the charge found on the surface of a conductor. The distribution of charge itself was assumed to be a surface having no width. Do you disagree with Dauto's explanation?

Dauto, if your response was correct it is a nice way to think about these things and a more intuitive explanation for "no electric field in a conductor at electrostatic equilibrium."

Thanks both of you.
 
  • #5
ThereIam said:
So as I understand it the discontinuity of the electric field (which has magnitude σ/ε) is due to the fact that the electric field outside the conductor is is equal to σ/2ε on both sides of the surface of a conductor in opposite directions.
σ is the charge per unit area of a planar array of charges here. σ/ε field lines emerge from charge σ, they go symmetrically up and down, so the density of field lines (the electric field strength) is σ/2ε on both sides of the plane.

ThereIam said:
That's all fine and good, but then the next section argues that since the electric field must be 0 inside (once the conductor has reached electrostatic equilibrium) and the discontinuity of the electric field is σ/ε as just proven, the electric field immediately outside the conductor must actually be σ/ε. Wait a minute! We just said it was σ/2ε outside! And we said that just inside in the opposite direction it was σ/2ε, talking as though there were actually a field immediately within.

What's going on here?

Here you have a plate of conductor of finite thickness. Giving charge to it, the charge appears on both surfaces, but there is no charge inside. The surface charge density is σ on both surfaces. Imagine that you remove the metal, and keep the charges only. You have two planes, separating three regions - one above, the second between the planes and the third below the plate. The electric field is the sum of the fields due to both planes, the red ones are field lines from the top plane and the blue ones are from the bottom plane. You see, there are 2(σ/2ε) field lines both above and below the metal plate and the field lines from the top plane are opposite to those from the bottom plate between the planes, so they cancel: the electric field is zero inside.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • metalplate.JPG
    metalplate.JPG
    16.4 KB · Views: 822
Last edited:
  • #6
ThereIam said:
Thank you for the replies. Dauto's response makes a bit more sense to me. mfb, in both cases I was referring to the charge found on the surface of a conductor. The distribution of charge itself was assumed to be a surface having no width. Do you disagree with Dauto's explanation?
All three explanations here just use different words to describe the same thing, I agree with all of them.
 

1. What is the discontinuity of electric field at the surface of a conductor?

The discontinuity of electric field at the surface of a conductor refers to the sudden change or jump in the electric field strength at the boundary between a conductor and a non-conductor (such as air or another material). This is due to the difference in the conductivity of the two materials, causing a difference in electric charge distribution.

2. Why does discontinuity of electric field occur at the surface of a conductor?

The discontinuity of electric field occurs at the surface of a conductor because of the behavior of electric charges. When an electric field is applied to a conductor, the charges inside it redistribute themselves in such a way that the net electric field inside the conductor is zero. However, at the boundary between the conductor and non-conductor, the electric field cannot penetrate the non-conductor, causing a sudden change in the electric field strength.

3. How does discontinuity of electric field affect the behavior of charges on the surface of a conductor?

The discontinuity of electric field at the surface of a conductor can cause the charges on the surface to redistribute themselves, resulting in a build-up of charges at certain points. This can lead to the phenomenon of surface charge accumulation, which can affect the overall behavior of the conductor and its ability to conduct electricity.

4. Is discontinuity of electric field a common occurrence in all conductors?

Yes, discontinuity of electric field is a common occurrence in all conductors. This is because all conductors have a surface boundary with a non-conductor (such as air) and therefore, experience a sudden change in electric field strength at this boundary.

5. How can the discontinuity of electric field at the surface of a conductor be minimized?

The discontinuity of electric field at the surface of a conductor can be minimized by using materials with similar conductivities at the boundary, such as using a conducting coating on the surface of a non-conducting material. Another way is to shape the surface of the conductor in a way that minimizes the sharpness of the boundary, thereby reducing the sudden change in electric field strength.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
811
Replies
3
Views
345
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
893
Replies
14
Views
933
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
3
Views
739
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top