Discover How to Measure Laser Wavelength with Modern Physics - HELP 911

  • Thread starter Thread starter kizersi5
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving formulas for measuring laser wavelength using interference patterns created by a monochromatic beam. The key equations presented are 1/λ = 2 * dm/m and m = (n-1)(2*d/1)*(Dp/Patm), where dm represents the distance moved by a mirror, m is the number of fringes crossing a reference point, and Dp is the pressure difference. The setup involves a half-silvered mirror that splits the beam, with interference occurring at point O when the beams are combined. The movement of the mirror alters the interference condition, leading to observable fringe changes that correlate with the wavelength. Assistance is requested for a step-by-step derivation of these formulas.
kizersi5
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
:!) :confused: My problem is that I am required to derive such formulae, which are:


MEASUREMENT of the LASER wavelength.


(1) 1 or lamda = 2* dm/m & (2) m=(n-1) ( 2*d/1)*(Dp/ Patm)

dm= distance of the movable mirror moved toward a beam splitter.

m= no. of fringes that cross a given reference point.

Dp = Pressure(final)- Pressure(initial)

d= distance of the vacuum air cell that was used upon experiment to generate fringes

Patm= atmospheric pressure=760atm.

I would appreciate any help deriving these formulae in step by step way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A monochromatic beam (1) entering from the left splits up at B, a half silvered mirror, into two beams (2) and (3) and is reflected back by two mirrors. Beam (2) continues onwards to O and on its return (3) is reflected downward also to O (part of both beams actually since the mirror is half silvered). At O the beams are combined optically resulting interference of the two beams. If the paths of the two beams , (2) and (3), are the same length constructive interference will result at and a bright fringe will be observed at O. If the movable mirror is moved \frac{\lambda}{4} closer to the beam splitter this condition will change to destructive interference. If the mirror is moved by \frac{\lambda}{2} one fringe change will be observed at O. This gives you your first equation.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top