Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Discover reports ArXiv dispute

  1. Mar 12, 2006 #1


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Discover magazine online reports the discussion of how much you have to publish in order for your blog to be considered part of scholarly discourse and accorded arxiv trackbacks.

    Discover sampled threads from three websites discussing the issues.
    They included for example this statement by Lee Smolin on "Cosmic Variance"
    Lee Smolin [Perimeter Institute of Theoretical Physics], posted March 4 6:57 pm

    Hi, it seems to me that this is not an issue of personal judgment, as there are principles and ethics in professional academic life that are expressed in policies that those employed by universities are governed by...

    If academic freedom means anything, it must mean that the university must do nothing to impede free discussion by professionally competent experts on scientific controversies. Given that Peter Woit is a Physics Ph.D. and a faculty member at a major university, who has published papers and has a book in press on the topic, he is without doubt part of the academic community to which the principles of academic freedom apply.

    Peter referred to the trackback discussion as a "food-fight" and linked to the Discover article.
    See the latest update here:
    Smolin's comment seems dignified enough, but some of the rest of the discussion does resemble a food-fight.
    Last edited: Mar 12, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 16, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Not sure if this is part of the "food-fight", but have you read this?


    There's some really damaging critique of String Theory in here. I don't quite know the background of the author (if he's a quack, I'll delete this post).

  4. Mar 16, 2006 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    that is Bert Schroer's paper.
    he is definitely not a quack
    his papers go back to around 1961
    he was long-time physics faculty at Uni Berlin
    now emeritus
    he could certainly be wrong, but he is a respected
    theoretical physicist (specialty algebraic QFT)

    more here:

    Woit has a blog post about Schroer's paper(s)
    and there is some discussion there by people with more
    knowledge of him.
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2006
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook