Discover the Potential of Spinning a Magnetic Sphere in an Electromagnetic Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nukedropout
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Idea
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential of spinning a magnetic sphere within an electromagnetic field, referencing an experiment that achieved extreme centrifugal forces leading to disintegration at speeds around 105 cm/sec. It highlights the work of J.W. Beams, which details the production of high centrifugal fields using magnetically suspended rotors. Additionally, the Levitron toy is mentioned as an example of magnetic levitation technology. The conversation also touches on the limits of rotation speed due to factors like residual drag torque, influenced by Earth's rotation and rotor imperfections. Overall, the topic emphasizes the fascinating interplay between magnetic suspension and rotational dynamics.
Nukedropout
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If you could suspend a magnetic sphere in a electromagnetic field, how fast could you spin it?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
You might look up the spinning rotor gauge. It sounds similur.
 
Nukedropout said:
If you could suspend a magnetic sphere in a electromagnetic field, how fast could you spin it?

Nukedropout, Welcome to Physics Forums!

Here is an experiment that spun the suspended sphere so fast that it disintegrated:
J.W. Beams, “The Production of High Centrifugal Fields”, Journal of Applied Physics, 1946, pp. 886-890
ABSTRACT
High centrifugal fields were produced by spinning small solid steel spherical rotors up to their bursting speeds. The rotors were supported magnetically in a vacuum by an improved method and spun by rotating magnetic fields. The peripheral velocities at which the rotors of various sizes, made of the same (flaw free) steel and having the same shapes, exploded, were roughly the same and of the order of 105 cm/sec. A centrifugal field of 2.4×108 times gravity was obtained with a .795‐mm spherical rotor which was the smallest diameter tried. Calculations indicate that in some cases plastic flow probably occurred in small regions near the centers of the spherical rotors somewhat below their bursting speed.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5155480&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fstamp%2Fstamp.jsp%3Ftp%3D%26arnumber%3D5155480

Here are some cool toys that suspend spheres magnetically:

Levitron is a brand of levitating toys and gifts in science and educational markets marketed by Creative Gifts Inc. and Fascination Toys & Gifts. The Levitron top device is a commercial toy that displays the phenomenon known as spin stabilized magnetic levitation. This method, with moving permanent magnets, is quite distinct from other versions which use changing electromagnetic fields, levitating various items such as a rotating world globe, model space shuttle or VW Beetle, and picture frame.
http://www.fascinations.com/unique-toys-gifts/levitron-revolution-series

If you like, you can buy some cool High strength NEODYMIUM SPHERE MAGNETS to experiment (or play) with:
http://www.kjmagnetics.com/products.asp?cat=12&gclid=CNuomNCtw7ECFQeR7QodOgcA8QFinally, this article seems to indicate there are limits to how fast the sphere may rotate. I do not pretend to understand this:
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 43, 1413 (1972); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1685456 (5 pages)
Residual Drag Torque on Magnetically Suspended Rotating Spheres
J. K. Fremerey
Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Bonn, 53 Bonn, Germany

An almost quantitative explanation of the residual drag torque on freely spinning steel spheres in magnetic suspension is given by comparing previously published experimental data with theoretical results of Keith (1963). Accordingly, the residual drag torque is mainly caused by the Earth's rotation. The associated decay ratio −ω∕ω increases quite linearly with the rotor angular velocity ω. A distortion of the rotational symmetry of the supporting magnetic field enhances the decay ratio. This effect decreases with increasing rotor speed. The influences of rotor imperfections and of lateral rotor vibrations are also considered.

© 1972 The American Institute of Physics
http://rsi.aip.org/resource/1/rsinak/v43/i10/p1413_s1?isAuthorized=no

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top