Discovering the Sun's New Twin: HD 101364

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Astronomers have discovered HD 101364, a yellow star that closely resembles our sun, making it the best solar twin identified to date. Located 220 light-years from Earth, HD 101364 shares similar mass, temperature, and chemical composition with the sun, though it may be slightly brighter and approximately one billion years older. This age difference could imply that any orbiting planets have had more time to develop life. The rarity of sun-like stars, which constitute only 4 percent of the Milky Way, adds significance to this discovery. The potential for life around HD 101364 raises intriguing questions about the evolution of extraterrestrial civilizations.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,340
Reaction score
7,138
I heard this the other day on a radio science program.

Astronomers have identified a yellow star they say is the best twin to our own sun yet seen. In other words, it's a star that's almost identical to the sun. And that's interesting because our sun shines on a life-bearing planet.

But stars like the sun are rare, according to astronomers. They account for only 4 percent of all stars in our Milky Way galaxy. And stars exactly like our sun must be even more rare. Scientists reported the previously best known example - a star named 18 Scorpii - ten years ago.

Now Jorge Melendez at Mount Stromlo Observatory in Australia and Ivan Ramirez at the University of Texas at Austin say they've found an even better solar twin. Its name is HD 101364. It is 220 light-years from Earth.

These astronomers say the star's mass, temperature, and chemical composition appear to match the sun's exactly. But the star may emit slightly more light than our sun. Since sun-like stars brighten as they age, this suggests the star may be a billion years older than our sun.

But that difference might actually be good news for extraterrestrial life seekers. It means an orbiting planet has had even more time to give rise to life than Earth has.
from http://www.Earth'sky.org/radioshows/51873/the-sun-has-a-twin


The star that is the sun's new twin - HD 101364 - also has the name HIP 56948.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.4290 - HIP 56948: A Solar Twin With a Low Lithium Abundance

http://kencroswell.com/HD98618.html

http://kencroswell.com/18scorpii.html
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Interesting article. However, if the sun is 1 billion years older than ours, that would suggest that if there is life on that solar system, it would be far superior to ours. So, how come they have not reached us yet. If we our sun is so identical, wouldn't they have picked up the similarities as well? Then again there could be life but maybe not nearly as advanced as us.
 
Ah, it's not a longlost binary companion, then.
 
Ironside said:
Interesting article. However, if the sun is 1 billion years older than ours, that would suggest that if there is life on that solar system, it would be far superior to ours. So, how come they have not reached us yet. If we our sun is so identical, wouldn't they have picked up the similarities as well? Then again there could be life but maybe not nearly as advanced as us.
I think the estimate on age is +/- 1 billion yrs. I think the sun and HD 101364 are more or less the same in size, class and luminosity, but that doesn't necessarily imply simliarity with respect to a planetary system. On the other hand, that is very interesting if the sun formed with a planetary system and HD 101364 did not.
 
Astronuc said:
I think the estimate on age is +/- 1 billion yrs. I think the sun and HD 101364 are more or less the same in size, class and luminosity, but that doesn't necessarily imply simliarity with respect to a planetary system. On the other hand, that is very interesting if the sun formed with a planetary system and HD 101364 did not.
True, there are a lot of factors to be considered, really all humanity can do is wait to advance in technology good enough to take us to other solar systems. For now we can only guess.
 
Astronuc said:
I think the estimate on age is +/- 1 billion yrs. I think the sun and HD 101364 are more or less the same in size, class and luminosity, but that doesn't necessarily imply simliarity with respect to a planetary system. On the other hand, that is very interesting if the sun formed with a planetary system and HD 101364 did not.

It's very true that an important factor is the probability that a sun similar to ours has planets orbiting it (isn't it one of the factors in the Drake equation?). And then there is the probability that a planet would be in the habitable range of possible orbits...and then that life would have formed and so on.

But still, I find that the most exciting aspect is that a star so similar to ours has been found so darn close! I bet people will aim telescopes at it and listen in the water hole region of teh spectrum.

Assuming that there are "people" there and that they would not be aiming any directed signals at us but that they have been broadcasting for more than 220 years, I assume that our technology is not advanced enough to monitor such stray signals from such a distance?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top