Checking Satisfiability of Compound Statement

  • Thread starter VinnyCee
  • Start date
In summary, this compound statement is satisfiable because it is possible to find a combination of true and false values for the variables p, q, r, and s that will make the entire statement true. This can be done by using logical equivalences such as Domination, Idempotent, Double negation, Commutative, De Morgan's, Absorption, Negation, Associate, and Distributive laws. By setting p = TRUE and q = FALSE, the statement becomes true.
  • #1
VinnyCee
489
0

Homework Statement



Is this compound statement satisfiable?

[tex](p\,\vee\,q\,\vee\,\neg\,r)\,\wedge\,(p\,\vee\,\neg\,q\,\vee\,\neg\,s)\,\wedge\,(p\,\vee\,\neg\,r\,\vee\,\neg\,s)\,\wedge\,(\neg\,p\,\vee\,\neg\,q\,\vee\,\neg\,s)\,\wedge\,(p\,\vee\,q\,\vee\,\neg\,s)[/tex]

Homework Equations



I guess you are supposed to use the following instead of truth tables somehow:

Logical equivalences - Domination, Idempotent, Double negation, Commutative, De Morgan's, Absorption, Negation, Associate, Distributive.

The Attempt at a Solution



I "converted" the first term in the expression:

[tex](p\,\vee\,q\,\vee\,\neg\,r)\,\equiv\,\left[(\neg\,p\,\longrightarrow\,q)\,\vee\,\neg\,r\right][/tex]

Now what do I do though?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I figured it out!

It was simple.

The equation is satifiable.

Set p = TRUE and q = FALSE. Since it is all OR logical connectives, it was simple to find these values which make the statement true.
 
  • #3
I really hope you didn't just try things at random. Just use those laws above. It is quite straight forward.
 
  • #4


can you "VinnyCee" answer this with some explanations

*Is this compound statement is satisfiable/why?


(b) (¬p ∨ ¬q ∨ r) ∧ (¬p ∨ q ∨ ¬s) ∧ (p ∨ ¬q ∨ ¬s) ∧
(¬p ∨ ¬r∨ ¬s)∧ (p ∨ q ∨ ¬r)(¬p ∨ ¬r∨ s)
 

1. What is the definition of satisfiability in compound statements?

Satisfiability in compound statements refers to the property of a logical statement being able to be evaluated as either true or false, based on the truth values of its individual components. In other words, a compound statement is satisfiable if there exists a combination of truth values for its components that makes the entire statement true.

2. How is satisfiability determined in compound statements?

Satisfiability in compound statements can be determined using truth tables, which list all possible combinations of truth values for the components of the statement and the resulting truth value of the entire statement. If there is at least one combination that makes the statement true, it is satisfiable. Alternatively, techniques such as resolution or semantic tableaux can also be used to determine satisfiability.

3. What is the importance of checking for satisfiability in compound statements?

Checking for satisfiability in compound statements is important because it allows us to determine whether a statement is logically consistent. If a statement is not satisfiable, it means that there is a contradiction or inconsistency within the statement, making it invalid. This is crucial in fields such as mathematics, computer science, and philosophy, where logical reasoning is a fundamental tool.

4. What are some common methods for checking satisfiability in compound statements?

Some common methods for checking satisfiability in compound statements include using truth tables, resolution, and semantic tableaux. These techniques are based on the principles of propositional logic and can be applied to statements with various levels of complexity. Other methods, such as SAT solvers and automated theorem provers, use algorithms and computer programs to determine satisfiability.

5. Can satisfiability be proven for all compound statements?

No, satisfiability cannot be proven for all compound statements. In fact, there are many statements that are undecidable, meaning that it is impossible to determine their truth value. This is a well-known problem in mathematics and logic, known as the incompleteness theorem. Therefore, there are certain statements for which satisfiability cannot be proven or disproven.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
36K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top