Checking Satisfiability of Compound Statement

  • Thread starter Thread starter VinnyCee
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the satisfiability of a compound logical statement involving multiple variables and logical connectives. Participants are exploring how to determine if the statement can be satisfied under certain variable assignments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use logical equivalences to analyze the compound statement but expresses uncertainty about the next steps after an initial transformation. Some participants question the approach of trying values randomly instead of applying logical laws systematically.

Discussion Status

There is a mix of approaches being discussed, with some participants suggesting a more structured application of logical laws while others have proposed specific variable assignments that they believe satisfy the statement. The conversation reflects differing interpretations of how to tackle the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering various logical equivalences and their implications, indicating a focus on foundational concepts in logic. There is also a mention of homework constraints that may affect the methods discussed.

VinnyCee
Messages
486
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is this compound statement satisfiable?

[tex](p\,\vee\,q\,\vee\,\neg\,r)\,\wedge\,(p\,\vee\,\neg\,q\,\vee\,\neg\,s)\,\wedge\,(p\,\vee\,\neg\,r\,\vee\,\neg\,s)\,\wedge\,(\neg\,p\,\vee\,\neg\,q\,\vee\,\neg\,s)\,\wedge\,(p\,\vee\,q\,\vee\,\neg\,s)[/tex]

Homework Equations



I guess you are supposed to use the following instead of truth tables somehow:

Logical equivalences - Domination, Idempotent, Double negation, Commutative, De Morgan's, Absorption, Negation, Associate, Distributive.

The Attempt at a Solution



I "converted" the first term in the expression:

[tex](p\,\vee\,q\,\vee\,\neg\,r)\,\equiv\,\left[(\neg\,p\,\longrightarrow\,q)\,\vee\,\neg\,r\right][/tex]

Now what do I do though?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I figured it out!

It was simple.

The equation is satifiable.

Set p = TRUE and q = FALSE. Since it is all OR logical connectives, it was simple to find these values which make the statement true.
 
I really hope you didn't just try things at random. Just use those laws above. It is quite straight forward.
 


can you "VinnyCee" answer this with some explanations

*Is this compound statement is satisfiable/why?


(b) (¬p ∨ ¬q ∨ r) ∧ (¬p ∨ q ∨ ¬s) ∧ (p ∨ ¬q ∨ ¬s) ∧
(¬p ∨ ¬r∨ ¬s)∧ (p ∨ q ∨ ¬r)(¬p ∨ ¬r∨ s)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
37K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K