Distance and gravitation problem.

  • Thread starter The_Journey
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Gravitation
In summary, the conversation discusses a problem in which an object is thrown on a planet with a given radius and acceleration due to gravity. The teacher suggests using conservation of energy to solve the problem, but a student asks if there is another way to solve it without using energy. The student then attempts to solve it using calculus, but runs into some difficulties. The conversation ends with the student asking for verification on their approach and if there is another way to solve the problem without using energy or calculus.
  • #1
The_Journey
19
0

Homework Statement


A planet has a radius of 500km, and the acceleration due to gravity on the surface is 3.00 m/ s^2. An object is thrown up with an initial velocity of 1000 m/s. What is the maximum height the object will go? (Note: acceleration due to gravity is not constant).

So my teacher said the easy way to solve this is using conservation of energy. But then I asked if there is another way and he said there is, and he challenged the entire AP Physics class to show how to solve the problem another way without using Energy.

Homework Equations



F = GMm / r ^ 2

Pretty much it unless I'm missing something else

The Attempt at a Solution



So I went with calculus on the acceleration of gravity.

Force of gravity = GMm / r^2.
acceleration due to gravity = GM / r^2 <-- acceleration changes with the radius

So I took the derivative of the acceleration equation with respect to r (radius)
da / dr = -2GM / r^3

Then integrated it back again, this time plugging in my limits as from r to r + h. Where h is the height.
so:

acceleration total = [tex]\int[/tex] (from r to r + h) (-2GM / r ^ 3) dr

Which became
acceleration total = GM / (r+h) ^2 - GM / r^2

There is where I ran into my first stumble, since this is the magnitude of the acceleration, I have to put acceleration into a vector. I'm mostly sure the acceleration is negative so I switched the signs.

acceleration total = GM / r^2 - GM / (r+h)^2 <--- This looked quite odd so I wasn't sure.

Then to find the height, I have to keep integrating. So acceleration - > velocity -> distance.

V = [tex]\int[/tex] a dt = [tex]\int[/tex] (GM / r^2 - GM / (r+h)^2) dt
V = GMt / r^2 - GMt / (r+h)^2 + v_initial

Now I integrate Velocity to get distance (which is the height).

h = [tex]\int[/tex] v dt = [tex]\int[/tex] (GMt / r^2 - GMt / (r+h)^2 +v_initial) dt

h = (1/2)GM * t^2 / r^2 - (1/2)GM * t^2 / (r + h)^2 + v_initial * t

So I have two equations, one for velocity final and for height. I set the equation for velocity final equal to 0 because when the object is at max height the velocity is 0.

0 = GMt / r ^ 2 - GMt / (r+h)^2 + v_initial. I need to solve for time because I need to eliminate the time variable

Solving for t I get this:

t = v_initial / (GM / (r+h)^2 - GM/r^2)

Then I need to plug t it into this equation:

h = (1/2)*GM * t^2 / r^2 - (1/2) * GM * t^2 / (r + h)^2 + v_initial * t

Which seems kind of crazy, but the t contains only h and constants, and plugging it into the equation for h has h equals to some constants and some h. Which seems right because using algebra I should be able to solve for h right? Can anyone verify it?

Was using calculus on the acceleration right in the first place? Was there a different way to solve it without using energy OR calculus?

Sorry I suck at using symbols for math equations.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I must admit I have not read your entire post. You are initially on the right track, but you should probably first think about what it is you need to integrate. Try think if you can use the kinematic relation a = dv/dt and v = dh/dt to something.
 

1. What is the relationship between distance and gravitational force?

The relationship between distance and gravitational force is described by Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, which states that the force of gravity between two objects is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

2. How does distance affect the strength of gravity?

The strength of gravity decreases as the distance between two objects increases. This is because the force of gravity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the objects. Therefore, the farther apart two objects are, the weaker the force of gravity between them.

3. Is there a minimum distance for gravitational pull?

No, there is no minimum distance for gravitational pull. According to the Law of Universal Gravitation, the force of gravity exists between all objects with mass, regardless of their distance. However, the strength of the force decreases as the distance increases, so at extremely large distances, the force of gravity becomes negligible.

4. How does the mass of an object affect the gravitational pull?

The mass of an object directly affects the strength of its gravitational pull. The greater the mass of an object, the stronger its gravitational pull will be. This is because the force of gravity is directly proportional to the masses of the two objects involved.

5. How does gravity vary with distance between two objects?

Gravity varies with distance between two objects according to the inverse square law. This means that as the distance between two objects increases, the force of gravity decreases by a factor of four. For example, if the distance between two objects is doubled, the force of gravity will decrease by a factor of four.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
802
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
730
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
959
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
870
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
319
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top