Distance of two moving particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the shortest distance between two moving particles along intersecting lines. The initial distance is denoted as d, with one particle having a velocity projection u towards d and a perpendicular projection v. The task is to derive a function that expresses the distance over time to find the shortest distance and the corresponding time, leading to the formulas r* = dv/V and t* = du/V². A coordinate system is suggested to simplify the problem, but one participant found a more straightforward solution that does not require coordinates. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding relative motion and distance calculations in physics.
Oomph!
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There are two particles. There are moving equally on two intersecting lines to intersection. On time t=0 is the distance of two particles d. The velocity of one particle relative to the other has a projection u in the direcion of d. In direction perpendicular to d is the projection v. The size of velocity of the particle relative to the other is V.

Task: find the shortest distance of particles and the time (r*,t*)
Answer: r*=dv/V; t*=du/V2

Homework Equations

; the attempt at a solution[/B]

V2=v2 + u2

I think I have to find a function which expresses the distance of the particles in time. I have to find extreme of the function - the shortest distance. However, I don't know how create this function.

Please, could you tell me how can I solve this?

Thank you.

16582_pohyb%2Bdvou%2B%25C4%258D%25C3%25A1stic.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oomph! said:
However, I don't know how create this function.
You can introduce a coordinate system. A good choice would be to have d aligned with one coordinate. What is the distance in this coordinate as function of time? What about the other coordinate?
 
Thanks. I found simplier solution where I don't need coordinates :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top