A little anecdote:
When
Carl Gauss was a boy, a teacher betasked the students in the classroom with summation of the integers from 1 to 100 inclusive of 1 and 100. Gauss immediately realized that 1+100=101, that 2+99=101,
et cetera, until one reaches 50+51=101, and that there were exactly 50 such pairs, so that the total must be 50*101=5050, so young Gauss wrote 5050 on his slate, and put the slate on his desk.
The teacher had done the exercise himself by a more time-consuming method, but had erred, and had a different sum as the to-himself putatively-correct result. Accordingly, he sent young Gauss to the office of the Principal/Headmaster, charged with defiance/impudence and failure to complete the exercise. There, young Gauss explained his reasoning, and after conference between the Principal/Headmaster and the teacher, it was decided that Gauss would be sent to higher education.
In the problem
instanter, uptaking the suggestion of
@PeroK to experimentally use n=5, please visualize a place with 5 accommodation locations, e.g. a bank with 5 teller stations, at which bank, persons are asked/directed to take a numbered slip, the slips being numbered with consecutive integers starting with 1. The first 5 persons occupy the 5 teller stations, one person per station. When a 6th person arrives, assuming that no-one has concluded business at any of the teller stations, the 6th person must either wait, or intrude himself, a 2nd person, at one of the teller stations.
That is an illustration of the pigeonhole principle.