Div and curl operators in a left-handed coordinate system?

Aidyan
Messages
182
Reaction score
14
In a right-handed cartesian coordinate system the divergence and curl operators are respectively:

\nabla \cdot A= \frac{\partial A_{x}}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial A_{y}}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial A_{z}}{\partial z}

\nabla \times \mathbf{A}= \begin{vmatrix}<br /> \widehat{x} &amp; \widehat{y} &amp; \widehat{z} \\<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial x} &amp; \frac{\partial}{\partial y} &amp; \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\<br /> A_{x} &amp; A_{y} &amp; A_{z} \\<br /> \end{vmatrix}= (\frac{\partial A_{z}}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_{y}}{\partial z}) \widehat{x}-(\frac{\partial A_{z}}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_{x}}{\partial z}) \widehat{y}+(\frac{\partial A_{y}}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_{x}}{\partial y}) \widehat{z}

While, for the (still right-handed) cylindrical coordinate system they are:

\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=\frac{A_{r}}{r} + \frac{\partial A_{r}}{\partial r} + \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial A_{\theta}}{\partial \theta}+\frac{\partial A_{z}}{\partial z}\nabla \times \mathbf{A}= \left( \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial A_{z}}{\partial \theta}- \frac{\partial A_{\theta}}{\partial z} \right) \overrightarrow{e_{r}} +<br /> \left( \frac{\partial A_{r}}{\partial z}- \frac{\partial A_{z}}{\partial r} \right) \overrightarrow{e_{\theta}} +<br /> \left( \frac{A_{\theta}}{r} + \frac{\partial A_{\theta}}{\partial r}- \frac{1}{r} \frac{\partial A_{r}}{\partial \theta} \right) \overrightarrow{e_{z}}

For a left-handed cartesian and cylindrical coordinate system is it just a matter of changing some sign in the third component? Or is it not that immediate? I'm bit unsure and confused about that... can someone help?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Orientation is a deliberate order. You see from the formulas, that the cross products depend on this order, so there is a left and right for it, i.e. a change of sign for the cross product if you switch from one to the other system.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top