A Div(gradΦ): Solve 3y12+2y22-3y1y32

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter kezzstar
  • Start date Start date
kezzstar
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Φ=3y12+2y22-3y1y32

Find: div(gradΦ).

I broke it down to find the partial derivative of all 3 coordinates y1,y2 and y3, so using the continuity equation:

y1=6y1-3y32
y2=4y2
y3=6y3y1

However, I'm not sure if this correct, would the first part give the gradient? Could someone confirm or solve this?

Regards
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kezzstar said:
Find: div(gradΦ).

I broke it down to find the partial derivative of all 3 coordinates y1,y2 and y3, so using the continuity equation:

y1=6y1-3y32
y2=4y2
y3=6y3y1

However, I'm not sure if this correct, would the first part give the gradient? Could someone confirm or solve this?

what is the gradient of a function ? its the slope of the curve representing the function/

divergence also has a meaning in calculus.
 
kezzstar said:
Φ=3y12+2y22-3y1y32

Find: div(gradΦ).

I broke it down to find the partial derivative of all 3 coordinates y1,y2 and y3, so using the continuity equation:

y1=6y1-3y32
y2=4y2
y3=6y3y1

However, I'm not sure if this correct, would the first part give the gradient? Could someone confirm or solve this?

Regards
The divergence of the gradient of a function is also known as the Laplacian of that function:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace_operator

What you have calculated so far is:

$$\frac{∂Φ}{∂y_1} = 6y_1-3y_3^2$$
$$\frac{∂Φ}{∂y_2}=4y_2$$
$$\frac{∂Φ}{∂y_3}=-6y_3y_1$$

or

##∇Φ = (\frac{∂Φ}{∂y_1},\frac{∂Φ}{∂y_2},\frac{∂Φ}{∂y_3}) = (6y_1-3y_3^2,4y_2,-6y_1y_3)##

The final step is

##div(grad Φ) = ∇ ⋅ ∇Φ = \frac{∂^2Φ}{∂y_1^2}+\frac{∂^2Φ}{∂y_2^2}+\frac{∂^2Φ}{∂y_3^2}##

(Note: edited to fix sign error in third term.)
 
Last edited:
Just to add, I believe you should get 10-6y1.

kezzstar said:
y3=6y3y1
I think you forgot a negative sign there.
 
You wrote
##y_1=6y_1-3y_3^2##
when you should have written
##\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial y_1}=6y_1-3y_3^2##.
I don't know if you made a mistake in understanding or used a lazy abuse of notation, but you really need to avoid misuse of the equality expression. If you want to write it as a semantic pairing of the left and right, but not an equality, you are better off using a colon or comma, or making a table.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top