Divergence and solenoidal vector fields

AI Thread Summary
To determine when the vector field F = |r|^n r is solenoidal, the divergence must be evaluated and set to zero. The divergence calculation leads to the expression 3(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^{n/2} + n(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^{n/2}, which simplifies to find that n must equal -3 for the divergence to be zero. Further discussion involves finding the value of λ that makes another vector field solenoidal, leading to the conclusion that if λ = 1, the field becomes zero, ensuring the divergence is also zero. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying divergence and understanding vector and scalar field interactions in these calculations.
MathematicalPhysics
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I want to find which values of n make the vector field

\underline{F} = {|\underline{r}|}^n\underline{r} solenoidal.

So I have to evaluate the divergence of this vector field I think, then show for which values of n it is zero?

Im starting by substituting:

\underline{r} = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}

getting..

\underline{F} = {(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{n/2}\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}

How can I extract

\underline{F_x}, \underline{F_y}, \underline{F_z}?

It's probably really simple but I can't see it! Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yeah I was being daft, after sleeping on it I came up with:

\underline{F} = [{(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{n/2}x, {(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{n/2}y, {(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{n/2}z]

That's better, yeah?

so
\underline{F}_x = {(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{n/2}x
\underline{F}_y = {(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{n/2}y
\underline{F}_z = {(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{n/2}z

now
\frac{\partial\underline{F}_x}{\partial x} = nx^2{(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{(n/2)-1} + {(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{n/2}

Hmm if n = 0 the first term is zero as required but the second term would become 1. So how can I find the values of n for which this is zero?
 
Last edited:
MathematicalPhysics said:
\frac{\partial\underline{F}_x}{\partial x} = nx^2{(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{(n/2)-1} + {(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)}^{n/2}

Hmm if n = 0 the first term is zero as required but the second term would become 1. So how can I find the values of n for which this is zero?

Calculating \nabla \cdot \vec{F} should give you:

3(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{n/2} + n(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{n/2}

Set that equal to zero and solving for n whould give you n = -3 as long as (x^2+y^2+z^2)^{n/2} \ne 0.

I think...
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I was having trouble simplifying my expression for divF, knowing what I was aiming for gave me the confidence to proceed lol! Cheers,

Matt.
 
Following on I'm trying to find the value of \lambda which makes

\frac{\lambda\underline{a}}{|\underline{r}|^3} - \frac{(\underline{a}.\underline{r})\underline{r}}{|\underline{r}|^5}

solenoidal. Where a is uniform.

I think I have to use div(PF) = PdivF + F.gradP (where P is a scalar field and F a vector field)

and grad(a.r) = a for fixed a.

So when calculating Div of the above, there should the a scalar field in there somewhere that I can separate out?!

I need some pointers please!
 
I don't understand what you mean when you say that 'a is uniform'. Fiddle around with the algebra and show me how far you get.
 
If this is wrong I can post my working (but its tedious to keep latexing my results!)

I get the expression down to \frac{(\lambda -1)a}{x^2+y^2+z^2}

so could I just say that if \lambda = 1 this would give "\underline{F}" say to be zero which implies dF/dx, dF/dy, dF/dz are all zero so divF = 0 which means it is solenoidal?

Thanks for being patient.

edit** is the (lambda -1)a the scalar field P to plug into that formula?
 
Last edited:
Where did you get that formula from? It makes no sense to me (i.e. you can't distribute an operator acting on different objects, scalars and vectors in this case). I know it's tedious to show your work but I can't really tell what your doing. For example, you obtained an expression which isn't even a vector!
 
sorry it was meant to be..

\frac{(\lambda -1)a}{(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^{3/2}} = \frac{(\lambda -1)a}{|\underline{r}|^3}

I forgot the 3/2 power which didn't make it a vector as you pointed out!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top