Divergence/flux of an E field for two spherical regions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hakkinen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Spherical
Hakkinen
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the following electric field:
<br /> \vec{E}=\frac{\rho }{3\varepsilon _{0}}\vec{r}<br /> where r\leq R
and <br /> \vec{E}=\frac{\rho R^3 }{3\varepsilon _{0}r^2}\hat{e_{r}}
where r&gt;R<br />

(a) calculate the divergence of the electric field in the two regions

(b) calculate the electric flux through a sphere of radius r<R and show it is equal to:
\int_{0}^{r}r^2 dr \int_{0}^{\pi }\sin \theta d\theta\int_{0}^{2\pi }d\phi \frac{\rho }{\varepsilon _{0}}

(c) calculate the electric flux through a sphere of radius r>R and show it's equal to:
\int_{0}^{R}r^2 dr \int_{0}^{\pi }\sin \theta d\theta\int_{0}^{2\pi }d\phi \frac{\rho }{\varepsilon _{0}}



Homework Equations



Divergence in spherical coordinates: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del_in_cylindrical_and_spherical_coordinates

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I have only been able to do part a.

Both regions of the electric field only have E_{r} components which simplifies the dot product.
So the div for reg. 1 is
\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{3\rho r^2}{3\varepsilon _{0}} = \frac{\rho }{\varepsilon _{0}}

and for reg 2 the divergence is 0 since \frac{\partial }{\partial r} \frac{r^2\rho R^3}{3r^2\varepsilon _{0}}=0

The flux of an E in a region would be \triangledown \cdot d\vec{A}. I can see in the volume integrals I am supposed to get that the terms in the integrands are the elements of the general differential surface area element of a spherical region. I am just stuck as to how to proceed and use the divergence theorem to show parts b and c.

Any help and assistance will be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you've already computed the value of \nabla \cdot \vec{E} everywhere, you can use

$$ \int d\vec{A} \cdot \vec{E} = \int dV (\nabla \cdot \vec{E}) $$

and just use what you calculated in the first part. Just remember that the surface in the integral on the left bounds the volume in the integral on the right.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
king vitamin said:
Since you've already computed the value of \nabla \cdot \vec{E} everywhere, you can use

$$ \int d\vec{A} \cdot \vec{E} = \int dV (\nabla \cdot \vec{E}) $$

and just use what you calculated in the first part. Just remember that the surface in the integral on the left bounds the volume in the integral on the right.

Thanks! So it's much simpler than I thought, just a straightforward application of the divergence theorem in the context of gauss' law.
 
Last edited:
however, could there be a typo in part c? I wrote it exactly as typed from the professor but if the divergence of that 2nd region is zero than the whole volume integral should be zero too?
 
Be careful! The divergence of E is actually a function of r here. As you noted, it takes different values in different regions. Did you notice the integration limits in part c)?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top