Dividing fraction trick, why does it work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction Work
Euler
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am going to assume everyone was taught the method where if you want to divide to fractions then you simply flip the second and then multiply them. I've been trying to see if I could find a reason as to why it works but I can't seem to. Does anyone know why or want to give me some hints?

Thanks for any help you can offer!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Euler said:
I am going to assume everyone was taught the method where if you want to divide to fractions then you simply flip the second and then multiply them. I've been trying to see if I could find a reason as to why it works but I can't seem to. Does anyone know why or want to give me some hints?

Thanks for any help you can offer!

Multiplication is the reverse of division.
If you turn the fraction upside down, then you will have to change the operation.(Multiplication to division and vise versa)
 
##\frac a b## is defined as ##a \cdot \frac 1 b##. The latter term is the multiplicative inverse. The multiplicative inverse of a rational ##\frac p q## is ##\frac q p##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
D H said:
##\frac a b## is defined as ##a \cdot \frac 1 b##. The latter term is the multiplicative inverse. The multiplicative inverse of a rational ##\frac p q## is ##\frac q p##.

Thank-you, that is very helpful.
 
A reasonable mathematical definition of division for real numbers is $$a\div b=c\text{ if and only if }a=c\times b.$$
The multiplicative inverse of a real number ##b## is the unique real number, denoted ##b^{-1}## or ##\frac{1}{b}##, such that ##b\times b^{-1}=1##. We see that $$a\times b^{-1}=(c\times b)\times b^{-1}=c\times( b\times b^{-1})=c\times 1=c$$, and so $$a\times b^{-1}=c.$$

Since both $$a\div b=c\text{ and } a\times b^{-1}=c,$$ we get that $$a\div b=a\times b^{-1},$$ and division by ##b## is the same as multiplication by the multiplicative inverse of ##b##. Because of the way that multiplication of rational expressions is defined, the multiplicative inverse of a rational expression is just that expression "flipped".
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top