Dividing Torque: Tangent and Centripetal Force Breakdown

AI Thread Summary
When torque is applied to an object, it results in angular acceleration, which can be analyzed by breaking down the tangent and centripetal force vectors. The discussion clarifies that all torque contributes to the change in angular velocity, while centripetal force acts to maintain circular motion without consuming energy. Centripetal force is perpendicular to the direction of travel, ensuring the object does not move in a straight line. An example provided involves a record spinning on a turntable, achieving a constant angular velocity of 33 and 1/2 RPM. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing rotational motion dynamics.
Drifter009
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm in the Rotational Motion Chapter.

After torque is applied to rotate an object,how do I go about breaking down the tangent vector and the centripetal force vector?

What I want to know is how the torque is being divided between the tangent direction and the radius direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure what you mean. An applied (net) torque creates an angular acceleration.

Perhaps you can give a specific example of what you are asking about.
 
You mean torque or the direction of velocity in uniform circular motion?

Maybe you can get some informaiton from this site:
http://ray.crk.umn.edu/physics/1012/lessons/lesson8.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doc Al,

I'm assuming when a torque is applied to a record to make it spin on the turn table that this results in an angular change in velocity, which settles into a constant velocity of 33 and 1/2 rpms. As a result of the constant angular velocity, a centripetal force occurs. I'm trying to begin with a torque and split how much force goes into the change of angular velocity, an how much force goes into the centripetal acceleration. My books doesn't explain this.
 
Drifter009 said:
I'm trying to begin with a torque and split how much force goes into the change of angular velocity, an how much force goes into the centripetal acceleration.
All of the torque goes into the change of angular velocity. The centripetal force is the force preventing the object from going in a straight path, and it's perpendicular to the direction of travel, so no work (or energy consumption) occurs.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top