Divisibility Problem: Show That n=3

  • Thread starter Thread starter geoffrey159
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divisibility
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the only natural number \( n \) greater than 1 for which \( 2n-1 \) divides \( (3n^2-3n+1)(3n^2-3n+2) \) is \( n = 3 \). The proof involves manipulating the expression \( P_n \) and showing that \( \hat{P_n} = \hat{0} \) leads to the conclusion that \( 2n-1 \) divides \( 3 - n \). It is established that \( n = 3 \) satisfies this condition, while no other natural numbers in the specified set can. The participants express uncertainty about the complexity of the proof but agree on its correctness.
geoffrey159
Messages
535
Reaction score
72

Homework Statement


Show that the only ##n \in \mathbb{N}-\{0,1\} ## such that ##2n-1|(3n^2-3n+1)(3n^2-3n+2)## is 3.

Homework Equations


## P_n = (3n^2-3n+1)(3n^2-3n+2) ##
Addition and multiplication in ## \mathbb{Z}/(2n-1)\mathbb{Z} ##

The Attempt at a Solution



Hello, I'm not 100% sure my proof is correct for this problem, can you check it please ? Do you see a simpler way of doing it ?

I want to show that in ## \mathbb{Z}/(2n-1)\mathbb{Z} ##, ## \hat {P_n} = \hat 0 \Rightarrow n = 3 ## .

First, I rewrite ## P_n = ( (2n-1)^2 + n(1-n) ) ( (2n-1)^2 + n(1-n) + 1 ) ##.

Using the fact that ## \hat 0 = \widehat {2n-1} ## and ## \hat n = \hat 1 - \hat n ##, I get that ##\hat {P_n} = \hat {n^2} ( \hat {n^2} + \hat 1) ##

Now, assuming that ## \hat {P_n} = \hat 0 ##, I get that
##\hat 0 = \hat{4} \hat {P_n} = \widehat{4n^4} + \widehat{4n^2} = \widehat{ (2n^2)^2 } + \widehat { (2n)^2 } = \widehat{ (2n)^2 } .\widehat{n^2} + \hat 1 . \hat 1 = \hat{n^2} + \hat 1 ##

Multiplying by ##\hat{2}## left and right :
##\hat 0 = \widehat{2n}.\hat{n} + \hat 2 = \hat n + \hat 2 = \hat 1 - \hat n + \hat 2 = \widehat{3 -n} ##

So ## 2n-1 | 3 - n ##. It is always true that ## 2n-1 | 0 ## so ## n = 3 ## is a solution. It is the only possibility because ##2n-1\ge |3 - n| ## so it does not divide ## 3 - n ## for any other ##n\in \mathbb{N}-\{0,1\}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you !
 
Do you know a simpler way of solving this problem ?
 
I don't see one.
 
Back
Top